Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2025

07:37
Translational Orthotopic Models of Glioblastoma Multiforme
Published on: February 17, 2023
3.0K
Prognostication in brain tumors.
Andrea Pace1, Antonio Tanzilli1, Dario Benincasa1
1Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Handbook of Clinical Neurology
|September 2, 2022
Summary
Communicating prognosis to brain tumor patients is crucial for autonomy and care planning. Cognitive deficits and coping styles present challenges, necessitating improved communication strategies for better patient involvement.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Palliative Care
- Medical Ethics
Background:
- Brain tumors, particularly glial tumors like glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic glioma, have a poor prognosis despite aggressive treatments.
- Palliative care needs differ significantly between primary and secondary brain tumors due to disease trajectory and prognosis variations.
- Effective communication of prognosis and treatment goals is vital for respecting patient autonomy and facilitating shared decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the complex factors influencing communication and treatment decisions in primary brain tumor patients.
- To highlight the unique trajectory of brain tumors, especially during the end-of-life phase, compared to the general cancer population.
- To identify barriers to effective prognosis communication and explore strategies for improved patient involvement in care.
Main Methods:
- Review of neuro-oncological literature on communication, prognosis awareness, and decision-making in brain tumor patients.
- Analysis of the impact of cognitive deficits on Medical Decisions Capacity (MDC) and patient participation.
- Examination of patients' coping styles and their influence on communication and care planning.
Main Results:
- Cognitive deficits in brain tumor patients significantly impair their capacity to understand, reason, and express choices, impacting their Medical Decisions Capacity.
- Patients' coping styles influence communication regarding diagnosis, prognosis, treatment goals, and end-of-life care preferences.
- Several barriers impede effective communication, hindering patients' involvement in treatment decisions, particularly in palliative care.
Conclusions:
- Improving prognostic awareness and communication is essential for respecting brain tumor patient autonomy and preferences.
- Addressing cognitive deficits and understanding coping styles are critical for enhancing communication quality.
- Developing effective strategies to overcome communication barriers is necessary to promote patient involvement in treatment and end-of-life decision-making.

