Vaccine efficacy trials for Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever: Insights from modelling different epidemiological

Juan F Vesga1, Raphaelle Métras2, Madeleine H A Clark3

  • 1Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Vaccine
|September 4, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Conducting Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) vaccine trials is feasible in Afghanistan and Turkey, but not South Africa, due to transmission levels. Higher vaccine efficacy reduces required trial endpoints and follow-up time.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Vaccinology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a priority emerging pathogen with no licensed vaccine.
  • Assessing the feasibility of phase III vaccine efficacy trials is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility of conducting phase III CCHF vaccine efficacy trials.
  • To determine the role of transmission dynamics in trial feasibility.
  • To estimate necessary sample sizes and follow-up durations for vaccine trials.

Main Methods:

  • Calibrated models of CCHF virus (CCHFV) transmission in Afghanistan, Turkey, and South Africa.
  • Simulated individual randomized controlled trials in high-risk populations.
  • Estimated minimum required cases (trial endpoints) for a 60% vaccine efficacy.

Main Results:

  • Afghanistan and Turkey require approximately 160,000-175,000 person-months of follow-up for 150 trial endpoints.
  • South Africa's low transmission levels make trials infeasible within realistic follow-up times.
  • Using infection as an endpoint, rather than clinical cases, reduces required person-months by 70-80% in Afghanistan and Turkey.

Conclusions:

  • Endemic transmission levels are central to the feasibility of phase III CCHF vaccine trials.
  • Afghanistan and Turkey present feasible settings for conducting such trials.
  • Optimizing trial endpoints and considering higher vaccine efficacy can enhance feasibility.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
711
Steps in Outbreak Investigation01:18

Steps in Outbreak Investigation

In the ever-evolving field of public health, statistical analysis serves as a cornerstone for understanding and managing disease outbreaks. By leveraging various statistical tools, health professionals can predict potential outbreaks, analyze ongoing situations, and devise effective responses to mitigate impact. For that to happen, there are a few possible stages of the analysis:
172
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
499
Cross-reactivity00:42

Cross-reactivity

Overview
31.4K