Left ventricular volume and ejection fraction measurements by fully automated 3D echocardiography left chamber...

Although transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) is now recommended by guidelines for left ventricular (LV) volumetric measurements, widespread implementation has been limited due to time constraints and required expertise. We hypothesized that fully automated 3DE left chamber quantification software might provide accurate measurements, and that its application could eliminate these obstacles.

To address this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following a search for studies that compared LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) using fully automated 3DE software (HeartModel or Dynamic HeartModel, Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, USA) with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), from 2015 to 2021. A random effects model was used to determine biases, correlations, and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and EF. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to determine effects of moderators on the outcome.

Of 12 studies (616 subjects), mean differences and 95 % CIs in EDV, ESV, and EF between fully automated 3DE software and CMR were -19.6 mL (95 % CI; -27.6 to -11.5 mL), -11.4 mL (-16.7 to -6.2 mL), and 0.4 % (-1.1 to 2.0 %), respectively. Corresponding correlation values between the two methods were 0.91 (0.86-0.94), 0.89 (0.82-0.93), and 0.85 (0.81-0.88), respectively. Meta-regression analysis revealed that there were no effects of either publication year, type of software, or type of analysis on the outcome of LV volumetric and functional parameters except for publication year on LVESV correlation values.

Although 3DE still underestimates LV volumes, the observed differences were no >20 mL. EF showed similar values to CMR. Excellent correlations between the two techniques make fully automated 3DE left chamber quantification software useful for routine clinical practice in adult population.