Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

What is Natural Selection?01:32

What is Natural Selection?

117.5K
Natural selection is an evolutionary process in which individuals with survival-promoting traits reproduce at higher rates. These favorable traits become more common within a population or species. Naturally selected traits initially arise via random genetic mutations. In order for selection to occur, there must be variation within a population, the trait controlling the variation must be heritable, and there must be an evolutionary advantage for variation in the trait.
117.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A bimodal longitudinal investigation on changes in sentiments over social media interactions owing to COVID-19 pandemic.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Deep Learning-Based Classification of Anopheles stephensi Adult Mosquitoes with Enhanced Solutions for Data Imbalance.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Artificial Intelligence and Citizen Science as a Tool for Global Mosquito Surveillance: Madagascar Case Study.

Insects·2025
Same author

A regional One Health approach to the risk of invasion by Anopheles stephensi in Mauritius.

PLoS neglected tropical diseases·2024
Same author

Citizen Science as an Approach for Responding to the Threat of <i>Anopheles stephensi</i> in Africa.

Citizen science : theory and practice·2024
Same author

Classifying stages in the gonotrophic cycle of mosquitoes from images using computer vision techniques.

Scientific reports·2023
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees
09:09

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees

Published on: November 15, 2014

11.0K

Artificial intelligence versus natural selection: Using computer vision techniques to classify bees and bee mimics.

Tanvir Bhuiyan1, Ryan M Carney2, Sriram Chellappan1

  • 1Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.

Iscience
|September 5, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explores how artificial intelligence can identify bees and the insects that mimic them. By training computer vision models on citizen science photographs, researchers tested if machines could distinguish between true bees, bumble bees, and mimics. The results show that these models are highly accurate at identifying bees but struggle with complex mimics. The researchers also used visualization techniques to confirm the AI focuses on relevant body parts, offering new ways to study insect evolution and support global citizen science projects.

Keywords:
Artificial intelligenceBioinformaticsComputing methodologyEntomologyZoologydeep learninginsect mimicrycitizen sciencephylogenymorphology

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Tactile Conditioning And Movement Analysis Of Antennal Sampling Strategies In Honey Bees Apis mellifera L.
10:14

Tactile Conditioning And Movement Analysis Of Antennal Sampling Strategies In Honey Bees Apis mellifera L.

Published on: December 12, 2012

10.7K
SwarmSight: Real-time Tracking of Insect Antenna Movements and Proboscis Extension Reflex Using a Common Preparation and Conventional Hardware
08:13

SwarmSight: Real-time Tracking of Insect Antenna Movements and Proboscis Extension Reflex Using a Common Preparation and Conventional Hardware

Published on: December 25, 2017

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees
09:09

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees

Published on: November 15, 2014

11.0K
Tactile Conditioning And Movement Analysis Of Antennal Sampling Strategies In Honey Bees Apis mellifera L.
10:14

Tactile Conditioning And Movement Analysis Of Antennal Sampling Strategies In Honey Bees Apis mellifera L.

Published on: December 12, 2012

10.7K
SwarmSight: Real-time Tracking of Insect Antenna Movements and Proboscis Extension Reflex Using a Common Preparation and Conventional Hardware
08:13

SwarmSight: Real-time Tracking of Insect Antenna Movements and Proboscis Extension Reflex Using a Common Preparation and Conventional Hardware

Published on: December 25, 2017

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Entomology research within computer vision
  • Evolutionary biology and artificial intelligence applications

Background:

Evolutionary biology often struggles to quantify the visual precision of mimicry in wild insect populations. No prior work had resolved how machine learning might objectively evaluate these complex biological signals. Researchers frequently rely on human perception, which may not align with the sensory capabilities of avian or other predators. That uncertainty drove the need for computational tools capable of processing large datasets of insect imagery. Prior research has shown that stingless insects frequently adopt bee-like appearances to deter threats. This gap motivated the application of advanced pattern recognition to classify diverse species from public databases. The current study leverages citizen science contributions to bridge the divide between ecological observation and quantitative analysis. Such digital approaches provide a scalable framework for examining morphological traits across vast geographical ranges.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence in classifying bees and their mimics. Researchers sought to determine if computer vision could accurately distinguish between these groups using images from citizen science databases. This investigation addresses the challenge of quantifying visual mimicry in wild populations. The team wanted to test whether machine learning models could serve as a proxy for natural predators. They also aimed to validate the anatomical features that the models prioritize during the classification process. By applying these techniques, the researchers hoped to gain new insights into insect morphology and evolutionary relationships. The study explores the potential of transdisciplinary approaches to enhance large-scale biological data analysis. This motivation stems from the need for more objective tools to study the evolution of defensive traits in stingless insects.

Main Methods:

Review approach involved training deep learning algorithms on a curated dataset of insect photographs. The researchers sourced images from public citizen science platforms to ensure broad taxonomic representation. They implemented specific classification architectures to distinguish between bees, bumble bees, and mimics. The team utilized class activation maps to interpret the internal logic of the trained neural networks. This visualization strategy allowed for the identification of key morphological features used by the models. The study employed t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding to map the high-dimensional feature space of the insect images. This statistical approach facilitated the assessment of clustering patterns relative to known evolutionary lineages. The methodology focused on evaluating model accuracy while comparing performance across different mimicry types.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature indicate that the models achieved 98% accuracy for bees and 97% for bumble bees. The algorithms demonstrated a significant drop in performance when detecting mimics that utilize both aggressive and defensive strategies. The class activation maps confirmed that the models focused on relevant anatomical components rather than background noise. This validation step provided biological insights into the specific traits driving mimicry. The t-SNE analysis showed perfect within-group clustering for the studied insect categories. Furthermore, the between-group clustering replicated the established phylogeny of the insects. The results highlight the efficacy of using artificial intelligence to quantify visual mimicry in nature. These findings suggest that computational models can effectively serve as a proxy for natural predator perception.

Conclusions:

Synthesis and implications suggest that automated classification systems offer a robust mechanism for analyzing insect mimicry patterns. The authors propose that computer vision effectively replicates phylogenetic relationships through unsupervised clustering techniques. These findings indicate that models successfully prioritize relevant anatomical features when distinguishing between different insect groups. The researchers note that the performance of these algorithms serves as a proxy for predator perception in natural environments. This work demonstrates that artificial intelligence can enhance the utility of large-scale citizen science datasets for biological research. The team suggests that future investigations should focus on the limitations observed in detecting complex defensive mimics. These results imply that transdisciplinary integration between computer science and entomology provides significant benefits for morphological studies. The authors conclude that their methodology supports broader efforts to document biodiversity and evolutionary adaptations in insects.

The researchers report that the models achieved 98% accuracy for bees and 97% for bumble bees. In contrast, the algorithms performed poorly when identifying mimics that display both aggressive and defensive traits, suggesting these insects effectively deceive the system just as they might a predator.

The team utilized class activation maps to visualize which image regions the algorithm prioritized. This technique confirmed the software focused on specific anatomical structures, providing researchers with insights into the physical traits that define mimicry in these stingless insects.

The authors employed t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) to visualize high-dimensional data. This statistical tool produced perfect within-group clustering and replicated the known evolutionary phylogeny of the insects, demonstrating the model's ability to capture meaningful biological relationships.

Citizen scientist images served as the primary data source for training the algorithms. These crowdsourced photographs provided the necessary scale and diversity to test the models across various species, including true bees, bumble bees, and their various mimics.

The models struggled most with mimics exhibiting dual aggressive and defensive behaviors. This specific measurement of failure highlights the high degree of visual similarity these insects share with their models, which likely confuses both the artificial system and natural predators.

The researchers propose that these transdisciplinary methods will improve global citizen science initiatives. They claim that combining computational approaches with biological data allows for more efficient investigations into the morphology and evolutionary history of diverse insect populations.