Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Novel Percutaneous Approach for Deployment of 3D Printed Coronary Stenosis Implants in Swine Models of Ischemic Heart Disease
Published on: February 18, 2020
Guidezilla™ guide extension catheter I for transradial coronary intervention.
Xinjun Lei1, Qi Liang1, Yuan Fang1
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
The Guidezilla™ guide extension catheter I (GGEC I) shows effectiveness in transradial coronary intervention (TRI) for complex coronary artery diseases (CAD). It offers advantages regardless of disease severity, with a high success rate and manageable complications.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a primary treatment for coronary artery diseases (CAD).
- Transradial coronary intervention (TRI) is increasingly preferred for its benefits.
- Evaluating novel devices like the Guidezilla™ guide extension catheter I (GGEC I) is crucial for optimizing TRI procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effectiveness and safety of the GGEC I in TRI.
- To identify indications for GGEC I use in complex coronary interventions.
- To determine if SYNTAX score stratification impacts GGEC I performance in TRI.
Main Methods:
- A case series of 221 patients with CAD undergoing TRI using GGEC I.
- Data collected on patient demographics, lesion characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes.
- Analysis of indications for GGEC I use, including heavy calcification and extreme tortuosity.
Main Results:
- The study included 221 patients with a high prevalence of complex lesions (triple-vessel, chronic total occlusion, type C).
- GGEC I was primarily used for heavy calcification (67%) and extreme tortuosity (12.2%).
- The overall success rate was 94.1% with a mean operation time of 58 minutes. No significant difference in outcomes was observed across SYNTAX score strata. Two cases of subacute thrombosis were reported perioperatively, during hospitalization, and at 1-month follow-up.
Conclusions:
- The GGEC I demonstrates potential advantages for transradial coronary intervention.
- Its effectiveness is not significantly influenced by the complexity of coronary artery disease as indicated by SYNTAX score.
- Careful patient selection and procedural technique are essential for optimal outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management

