Exome sequencing for structurally normal fetuses-yields and ethical issues.
Hagit Daum1,2, Tamar Harel3,4, Talya Millo3
1Department of Genetics, Hadassah Medical Organization, Jerusalem, Israel. dhagit100@gmail.com.
European Journal of Human Genetics : EJHG
|September 7, 2022
Summary
Exome sequencing (ES) identified significant genetic findings in 0.8% of structurally normal fetuses, suggesting it offers greater diagnostic yield than chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) alone. This highlights the importance of comprehensive genetic testing for prenatal diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Medical Genetics
- Prenatal Diagnosis
- Genomic Medicine
Background:
- Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has a known diagnostic yield in structurally normal fetuses, ranging from 0.4% to 1.4%.
- The incremental diagnostic value of exome sequencing (ES) in this specific population remains to be fully elucidated.
- Advances in next-generation sequencing technologies necessitate re-evaluation of diagnostic strategies in prenatal settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the additional diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) in fetuses with normal ultrasound findings.
- To compare the efficacy of ES against established methods like CMA for detecting pathogenic genetic variants.
- To assess the implications of ES findings for genetic counseling and prenatal care.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 1,526 fetal exome sequencing cases performed between February 2017 and April 2022.
- Focus on a subset of 482 fetuses with structurally normal ultrasound examinations.
- Reporting of pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants according to ACMG classification, including childhood-relevant secondary findings.
Main Results:
- Four out of 482 (0.8%) structurally normal fetuses had P/LP variants associated with moderate to severe conditions (Wilson disease, Enhanced S-cone syndrome, Legius syndrome, Muenke syndrome).
- Two additional fetuses had clinically relevant secondary findings.
- The overall detection rate of significant findings via ES in this cohort underscores its utility beyond CMA.
Conclusions:
- Relying solely on CMA for structurally normal fetuses may lead to missed diagnoses and false reassurance.
- Prenatal exome sequencing offers a higher diagnostic yield, identifying significant genetic conditions.
- Comprehensive genetic testing, including ES, requires careful management, restrictive analysis protocols, and robust pre- and post-test genetic counseling.
Related Concept Videos
Teratogenicity
2.6K
The ability of a drug to produce structural deformations and functional abnormalities in the developing embryo or the fetus is called teratogenicity, and the drug producing this effect is known as a teratogen. Teratogenic effects include stillbirth, miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction, and neurocognitive delay. A teratogen may affect the embryo at different stages of development, which is important in determining the type and extent of the damage. During blastocyst formation, the early...
2.6K
CRISPR
52.7K
Genome editing technologies allow scientists to modify an organism’s DNA via the addition, removal, or rearrangement of genetic material at specific genomic locations. These types of techniques could potentially be used to cure genetic disorders such as hemophilia and sickle cell anemia. One popular and widely used DNA-editing research tool that could lead to safe and effective cures for genetic disorders is the CRISPR-Cas9 system. CRISPR-Cas9 stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced...
52.7K


