Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

6.1K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.1K
Genome Annotation and Assembly03:36

Genome Annotation and Assembly

19.2K
The genome refers to all of the genetic material in an organism. It can range from a few million base pairs in microbial cells to several billion base pairs in many eukaryotic organisms. Genome assembly refers to the process of taking the DNA sequencing data and putting it all back together in a correct order to create a close representation of the original genome. This is followed by the identification of functional elements on the newly assembled genome, a process called genome annotation.
19.2K
Leaky Scanning02:28

Leaky Scanning

5.2K
During most eukaryotic translation processes, the small 40S ribosome subunit scans an mRNA from its 5' end until it encounters the first start AUG codon. The large 60S ribosomal subunit then joins the smaller one to initiate protein synthesis. The location of the translation initiation is largely determined by the nucleotides near the start codon as there may be multiple translation initiation sites present on the mRNA.  Marilyn Kozak discovered that the sequence RCCAUGG (where R...
5.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genome assemblies and annotations are not static and need support for tracking their evolution.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Visual adaptation of a biting fly that permanently foregoes flight.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026
Same author

Spatial transcriptomics reveals expression gradients in developing wheat inflorescences at cellular resolution.

The Plant cell·2025
Same author

A dataset of tissue-specific gene expression dynamics during seed development in Brassica.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

Genomic and genetic insights into Mendel's pea genes.

Nature·2025
Same author

Extensive N4 cytosine methylation is essential for Marchantia sperm function.

Cell·2025
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 29, 2025

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis
09:37

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis

Published on: July 12, 2022

3.5K

Interpreting alignment-free sequence comparison: what makes a score a good score?

Martin T Swain1, Martin Vickers2

  • 1Department of Life Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Penglais, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, SY23 3DA, UK.

NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
|September 8, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Alignment-free methods for sequence comparison provide similarity scores that are hard to interpret. New objective functions and the KAST tool help calibrate these scores, improving the accuracy of identifying true positives in biological data.

More Related Videos

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

35.4K
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

68.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 29, 2025

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis
09:37

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis

Published on: July 12, 2022

3.5K
A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

35.4K
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

68.8K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Alignment-free methods offer an alternative to traditional sequence alignment for large-scale data analysis.
  • Interpreting similarity scores from alignment-free methods is challenging and context-dependent.
  • Understanding score distributions is crucial for evaluating metric performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop objective functions for interpreting and calibrating alignment-free similarity scores.
  • To investigate the impact of sequence characteristics, such as length, on alignment-free metrics.
  • To enhance the utility of alignment-free approaches by improving true positive identification.

Main Methods:

  • Empirical analysis of DNA and protein sequences using various alignment-free metrics.
  • Characterization of similarity score distributions under different parameters.
  • Development and application of objective functions for score calibration.
  • Creation of the KAST software tool for high-throughput analysis.

Main Results:

  • Similarity scores are significantly influenced by sequence length and length differences.
  • Objective functions enable accurate estimation of true positive probabilities.
  • Visualizing score distributions provides insights into metric performance.
  • The KAST tool facilitates efficient alignment-free analysis.

Conclusions:

  • Objective functions are essential for reliable interpretation of alignment-free similarity scores.
  • Sequence length is a critical factor affecting alignment-free metric performance.
  • The proposed methods and KAST tool significantly improve the utility and accuracy of alignment-free sequence comparison.