Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

08:24
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
791
Potential influence of decision time on punishment behavior and its evaluation
Kaede Maeda1, Yuka Kumai2, Hirofumi Hashimoto3
1Department of Psychology, College of Contemporary Psychology, Rikkyo University, Niiza, Japan.
Frontiers in Psychology
|September 8, 2022
Summary
Punishing others is not always rewarded. People view punishment more positively when it is deliberated upon or enacted by a third party, rather than an intuitive or immediate reaction.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
- Decision Science
Background:
- Conflicting findings exist regarding reputational gains from punitive behavior.
- Previous research has not clearly defined conditions for positive evaluation of costly punishment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To clarify the conditions under which costly punishment leads to positive evaluations.
- To investigate the role of decision time and victim status in the perception of punishment.
Main Methods:
- Utilized public goods games (PGG) with manipulated decision times for punitive behavior.
- Employed second- and third-party punishment games to assess evaluations of punishment.
- Collected impression evaluations of punitive actions toward non-cooperative or self-interested individuals.
Main Results:
- Intuitive punishment did not lead to positive evaluations.
- Punishment was positively evaluated when decisions were deliberated or made by third parties.
- The timing and source of punishment significantly influenced its perceived value.
Conclusions:
- Deliberative punishment, particularly by non-victims, can be positively evaluated.
- Findings extend understanding of punitive behavior evaluation, highlighting the importance of considered judgment over immediate reaction.
Related Concept Videos
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
147
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
147
Punishment
297
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
297
Decision Making
187
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
187
Reason and Intuition
6.7K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.7K
Operant Conditioning
1.8K
Operant conditioning, a key concept in behavioral psychology, involves using reinforcement and punishment to alter the likelihood of a behavior being repeated. B.F. introduced this type of conditioning. Skinner focused on voluntary behaviors and the consequences that follow them, influencing whether these behaviors will be strengthened or diminished.
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
1.8K
Decision Making: P-value Method
5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.6K

