Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editorial: How do Abstract Representations Enable Transfer?

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

When forewarned is not forearmed: No evidence for cue-based proactive control in the spatial Stroop task.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Bindings for Action: Bridging the Gap Between Theories of Procedural Working Memory and Action Control Research.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

Are the automatic effects of instructions modulated by instructed, context-specific strategic control?

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Effects of Context Changes on Memory Reactivation.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2024
Same author

Eleven strategies for making reproducible research and open science training the norm at research institutions.

eLife·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.7K

Assessing the Durability of One-Shot Stimulus-Control Bindings.

Peter S Whitehead1, Christina U Pfeuffer2, Tobias Egner1,3

  • 1Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

Journal of Cognition
|September 8, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

One-shot stimulus-control bindings are durable for at least 5 minutes without interference, but decay within 2 minutes when similar events intervene. This highlights interference as a key factor limiting long-term control learning.

Keywords:
Action and perceptionCognitive ControlLearning

More Related Videos

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
07:19

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance

Published on: March 19, 2020

6.0K
Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
16:00

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

22.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.7K
A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
07:19

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance

Published on: March 19, 2020

6.0K
Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
16:00

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

22.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Cognitive control may involve stimulus-control bindings within episodic event files.
  • Prior work demonstrated one-shot learning of these bindings.
  • The durability of these bindings remains largely unexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the durability of one-shot stimulus-control bindings.
  • To examine the influence of time and intervening events on binding longevity.
  • To differentiate between temporal decay and interference effects.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted to test binding durability.
  • Stimulus-control bindings were encoded (prime) and later retrieved (probe).
  • Durability was assessed across varying time intervals and intervening event densities.

Main Results:

  • Stimulus-control bindings showed robustness to temporal decay, lasting up to 5 minutes without interference.
  • Binding effects were significantly shorter (approx. 2 minutes) when similar intervening events were present.
  • Interference from similar events proved to be a more substantial limiting factor than temporal decay.

Conclusions:

  • One-shot stimulus-control bindings are relatively durable against time alone.
  • Interference from subsequent similar events significantly shortens the effective duration of these bindings.
  • Interference, not temporal decay, is the primary constraint on the long-term impact of one-shot control learning.