Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters
Published on: November 22, 2019
Campus Information Sharing and Responses to Sexual Misconduct Violations: An Exploratory Study
Ryan T Shields1, Joan Tabachnick2, Laurie T Becker1
1School of Criminology and Justice Studies, 14710University of Massachusetts Lowell, MA, USA.
Colleges share information on student sexual misconduct internally more than externally. Many institutions lack policies for inter-campus data sharing, and effectiveness of current practices remains unproven.
Area of Science:
- Higher Education Administration
- Student Conduct
- Sexual Misconduct Policy
Background:
- Growing public and institutional interest in responses to sexual misconduct.
- Limited research on how higher education institutions (IHEs) process and share information on students found responsible for sexual misconduct.
- Need to understand current practices and challenges in information sharing among IHEs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore how IHEs share information about students found responsible for sexual misconduct internally and between institutions.
- To investigate how IHEs respond to information about applicants previously sanctioned for sexual misconduct.
- To identify key questions and parameters for future research in this area.
Main Methods:
- Practitioner-researcher collaboration.
- Dissemination of a questionnaire to campus administrators, including Title IX coordinators and student conduct administrators.
- Data collected from 176 participants via higher education association listservs.
Main Results:
- 80% of IHEs have internal policies for sharing information on sexual misconduct.
- Approximately 50% have policies for sharing information with other IHEs.
- Nearly one-third use transcript notation for information sharing.
- About 25% have denied admission based on prior sanctions; 25% have admitted such students.
- Most IHEs do not track outcomes for admitted students with prior sanctions.
Conclusions:
- Significant variation exists in IHE policies and practices regarding sexual misconduct information sharing.
- Current inter-institutional information sharing is limited, and its effectiveness is largely unevaluated.
- Further evaluation research is necessary to inform future policy development and mandates.
More Related Videos
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
08:53Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Survey Safety
Case Studies
Cross-Sectional Research
Ethics in Research