Performance Evaluation and Validation of Air Samplers To Detect Aerosolized Coxiella burnetii

A M Hasanthi Abeykoon1, Megan Poon1, Simon M Firestone1

  • 1Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbournegrid.1008.9, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Microbiology Spectrum
|September 8, 2022
PubMed

Insights

This study evaluated three air samplers for detecting airborne Coxiella burnetii, the cause of Q fever. All samplers detected the bacteria, with the AirPort MD8 showing higher recovery at high concentrations, aiding in risk assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental microbiology
  • Infectious disease epidemiology
  • Aerosol science

Background:

  • Coxiella burnetii is a zoonotic pathogen causing Q fever, transmitted via inhalation of aerosols.
  • Detecting airborne C. burnetii is crucial for monitoring and controlling disease spread from animal reservoirs.
  • Existing air sampling technologies require validation for effective C. burnetii detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy of three distinct air samplers (AirPort MD8, BioSampler, Coriolis Micro) for detecting aerosolized Coxiella burnetii.
  • To compare the performance of different collection media (PBS and Alk PEG) with the air samplers.
  • To evaluate the impact of varying C. burnetii concentrations on sampler recovery rates.

Main Methods:

  • Aerosolized C. burnetii was generated at three concentrations and collected using AirPort MD8, BioSampler, and Coriolis Micro.
  • Two liquid media, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and alkaline polyethylene glycol (Alk PEG), were tested.
  • Bacterial DNA was quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) targeting single-copy (com1) and multicopy (IS1111) genes.

Main Results:

  • All three air samplers successfully detected airborne C. burnetii across tested concentrations.
  • The AirPort MD8 demonstrated higher, though variable, recovery at high concentrations.
  • BioSampler and Coriolis Micro showed more repeatable results at lower concentrations, with comparable performance to AirPort MD8 at intermediate and low levels.

Conclusions:

  • All evaluated air samplers are effective for detecting airborne C. burnetii, but performance varies with concentration and device.
  • The AirPort MD8 showed superior recovery at high concentrations and ease of field use.
  • Further validation under field conditions is recommended to optimize Q fever risk assessment strategies around infection sources.