Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Engineering Antiviral Agents via Surface Plasmon Resonance
Published on: June 14, 2022
A comparative study of receptor interactions between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 from molecular modeling
Hien T T Lai1, Ly H Nguyen1, Anh D Phan2
1Key Laboratory for Multiscale Simulation of Complex Systems, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, 334 Nguyen Trai street, Hanoi, 11416, Vietnam.
Abstract:
The pandemic of COVID-19 severe acute respiratory syndrome, which was fatal for millions of people worldwide, triggered the race to understand in detail the molecular mechanisms of this disease. In this work, the differences of interactions between the SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2 Receptor binding domain (RBD) and the human Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor were studied using in silico tools. Our results show that SARS-CoV-2 RBD is more stable and forms more interactions with ACE2 than SARS-CoV. At its interface, three stable binding patterns are observed and named red-K31, green-K353 and blue-M82 according to the central ACE2 binding residue. In SARS-CoV instead, only the first two binding patches are persistently formed during the MD simulation. Our MM/GBSA calculations indicate the binding free energy difference of about 2.5 kcal/mol between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV which is compatible with the experiments. The binding free energy decomposition points out that SARS-CoV-2 RBD-ACE2 interactions of the red-K31 ([Formula: see text]) and blue-M82 ([Formula: see text]) patterns contribute more to the binding affinity than in SARS-CoV ([Formula: see text] for red-K31), while the contribution of the green-K353 pattern is very similar in the two strains ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV, respectively). Five groups of mutations draw our attention at the RBD-ACE2 binding interface, among them, the mutation -PPA469-471/GVEG482-485 has the most important and favorable impact on SARS-CoV-2 binding to the ACE2 receptor. These results, highlighting the molecular differences in the binding between the two viruses, contribute to the common knowledge about the new corona virus and to the development of appropriate antiviral treatments, addressing the necessity of ongoing pandemics.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
G Protein-coupled Receptors
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or serpentine receptors, and consist of seven (H1-H7) transmembrane alpha-helices that span the bilayer to form a cylindrical core. The transmembrane helices are connected by three extracellular loops and three...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Conjugated Proteins
Nucleoproteins are protein complexes that contain nucleic acids, categorized as deoxyribonucleoproteins (DNPs) or ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) respectively. The nucleosome is a typical example of a DNP where nuclear DNA is associated with histone proteins. The major antigen for the Covid-19 virus SARS-CoV is an RNP that is critical...
Quantitative Aspects of Drug-Receptor Interaction
The Two-State Receptor Model
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with...
Molecular Models

