Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025
Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia
Published on: November 6, 2017
Detection of Nonglaucomatous Macula Findings With Ganglion Cell Analysis Printouts vs Full Macular Cube Scans
Maya Yamane1, Henry Ferreyra1, Benjamin Y Xu2
1Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego.
Importance:
Ganglion cell analysis (GCA) of ocular coherence tomography (OCT) imaging is routinely used to detect and monitor glaucomatous damage of the ganglion cell complex in the macula. The GCA printout provides qualitative and quantitative data about the macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer and a single B-scan of the retina through the fovea. However, the full macular cube scan, including all 128 B-scans, is available for review. The macular cube scan provides considerable information about nonglaucomatous ocular pathology that may be missed if clinicians review only the GCA printout.
Objective:
To determine the frequency and type of nonglaucomatous macular findings that are observable in the full macular cube scan but not the GCA printout.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of GCA printouts and full macular cube scans to detect nonglaucomatous macular pathology at a tertiary care academic center. Consecutive patients undergoing ganglion cell complex imaging during routine glaucoma evaluations over a 1-week period in a multi-clinician glaucoma clinic.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The prevalence and type of nonglaucomatous macular pathology visible on the GCA printout or macular cube scan.
Results:
Among 105 patients (mean (SD) age, 67 (15.46) years; 63 [60%] female and 42 [40%] male) 201 eyes were imaged (64 [31.7%] with suspected glaucoma, 126 [62.4%] with open-angle glaucoma, 6 [3.0%] with closed-angle glaucoma, and 6 [3.0%] with other glaucoma). GCA printouts and macular cube scans revealed nonglaucomatous macular pathology in 65 eyes (32.2%). Of these, 25 eyes (38.5%) included findings that were not visible on the GCA printout. Of the cases not visible on the printout, 16 eyes (64.0% ) included macular pathology that required further evaluation.
Conclusions And Relevance:
The findings indicate that nonglaucomatous macular pathology may be missed based on GCA printouts alone. While it may be beneficial to review the full macular cube to detect potentially vision-threatening disease and ensure proper patient care, this study cannot determine if this missed pathology affects clinical outcomes.
