Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Administration of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in Adolescent and Adult Mice
Published on: August 1, 2025
Equity in Coverage of Local Cannabis Control Policies in California, 2020‒2021
Ellicott C Matthay1, Leyla M Mousli1, Cynthia Fu1
1Ellicott C. Matthay is with the Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY. Leyla M. Mousli is with the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco. Cynthia Fu, Serena Zhang, and Dorie E. Apollonio are with the School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco. William R. Ponicki and Paul Gruenewald are with the Prevention Research Center, Berkeley, CA. Laura A. Schmidt is with the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies and the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Abstract:
Objectives. To assess whether cannabis control policies that may protect public health were adopted evenly across California localities with differing sociodemographic compositions. Methods. From November 2020 to January 2021, we measured cannabis control policies for 241 localities across California and linked them to data on the characteristics of the communities affected by these policies. We evaluated whether disadvantaged communities were more likely to allow cannabis businesses and less likely to be covered by policies designed to protect public health. Results. Localities with all-out bans on cannabis businesses (65% of localities) were disproportionately high-education (55.8% vs 50.5% with any college) and low-poverty (24.3% vs 34.2%), with fewer Black (4.4% vs 6.9%) and Latinx (45.6% vs 50.3%) residents. Among localities that allowed retail cannabis businesses (28%), there were more cannabis control policies in localities with more high-income and Black residents, although the specific policies varied. Conclusions. Cannabis control policies are unequally distributed across California localities. If these policies protect health, inequities may be exacerbated. Public Health Implications. Uniform adoption of recommended cannabis control policies may help limit any inequitable health impacts of cannabis legalization. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(11):1640-1650. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307041).
Related Concept Videos
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Drug Regulation
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Cannabinoids
Two synthetic agonists of THC,...
Drug Distribution: Overview
Initially, the free drug in the...
An Overview of Psychoactive Drugs
Stimulants such as cocaine, amphetamines, and nicotine enhance brain activity, leading to increased alertness, attention, and energy. These drugs typically raise heart rate, blood pressure, and body temperature. While they can induce feelings of euphoria, their misuse can result in severe health...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...

