Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Ventricular-Arterial Coupling Derived From Proximal Aortic Stiffness and Aerobic Capacity Across the Heart Failure
Nicola Riccardo Pugliese1, Alessio Balletti1, Silvia Armenia1
1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Insights
Ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) is impaired in heart failure (HF), worsening with disease severity. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) shows poorer VAC than heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) when assessed by aortic arch pulsed wave velocity (aa-PWV) to global longitudinal strain (GLS) ratio.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Physiology
Background:
- Ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) quantifies the relationship between arterial stiffness (pulsed wave velocity [PWV]) and myocardial function (global longitudinal strain [GLS]).
- Evaluating VAC is crucial for understanding heart failure (HF) pathophysiology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess VAC across the spectrum of HF.
- To compare VAC in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
Main Methods:
- Introduced a Doppler-derived single-beat technique for aortic arch PWV (aa-PWV) alongside tonometry-derived carotid-femoral PWV (cf-PWV).
- Measured PWV and GLS in healthy controls, individuals at risk for HF (stage A-B), and patients with HFpEF and HFrEF (stage C).
- Utilized combined cardiopulmonary-echocardiography exercise stress to evaluate peak oxygen consumption and peripheral extraction.
Main Results:
- aa-PWV was lower than cf-PWV across all groups.
- VAC, expressed as cf-PWV/GLS, was similarly compromised in HFpEF and HFrEF.
- VAC, expressed as aa-PWV/GLS, was more impaired in HFpEF than HFrEF.
- VAC was significantly worse in HF stages A-B and C compared to controls.
- Abnormal VAC correlated with reduced peak oxygen consumption and independently predicted exercise capacity.
Conclusions:
- Abnormal VAC is linked to increased HF severity and diminished functional capacity.
- HFpEF demonstrates a more compromised VAC than HFrEF when assessed using the aa-PWV/GLS ratio.
- The aa-PWV/GLS ratio is a valuable indicator of exercise capacity in HF.
Background:
Ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) can be evaluated as the ratio between arterial stiffness (pulsed wave velocity [PWV]) and myocardial deformation (global longitudinal strain [GLS]).
Objectives:
This study aimed to evaluate VAC across the spectrum of heart failure (HF).
Methods:
The authors introduced a Doppler-derived, single-beat technique to estimate aortic arch PWV (aa-PWV) in addition to tonometry-derived carotid-femoral PWV (cf-PWV). They measured PWVs and GLS in 155 healthy controls, 75 subjects at risk of developing HF (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stage A-B) and 236 patients in stage C heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n = 104) or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n = 132). They evaluated peak oxygen consumption and peripheral extraction using combined cardiopulmonary-echocardiography exercise stress.
Results:
aa-PWV was obtainable in all subjects and significantly lower than cf-PWV in all subgroups (P < 0.01). PWVs were directly related and increased with age (all P < 0.0001). cf-PWV/GLS was similarly compromised in HFrEF (1.09 ± 0.35) and HFpEF (1.05 ± 0.21), whereas aa-PWV/GLS was more impaired in HFpEF (0.70 ± 0.10) than HFrEF (0.61 ± 0.14; P < 0.01). Stage A-B had values of cf-PWV/GLS and aa-PWV/GLS (0.67 ± 0.27 and 0.48 ± 0.14, respectively) higher than controls (0.46 ± 0.11 and 0.39 ± 0.10, respectively) but lower than stage C (all P < 0.01). Peak arteriovenous oxygen difference (AVO2diff) was inversely related with cf-PWV/GLS and aa-PWV/GLS (all P < 0.01). Although cf-PWV/GLS and aa-PWV/GLS independently predicted peak VO2 in the overall population (adjusted R2 = 0.33 and R2= 0.36; all P < 0.0001), only aa-PWV/GLS was independently associated with flow reserve during exercise (R2 = 0.52; P < 0.0001).
Conclusions:
Abnormal VAC is directly correlated with greater severity of HF and worse functional capacity. HFpEF shows a worse VAC than HFrEF when expressed by aa-PWV/GLS.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction

