Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Impact of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction on Clinical Outcomes in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease
Sébastien Hecht1, Steele C Butcher2, Stephan M Pio3
1Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Insights
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) impacts outcomes in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease. Lower LVEF (<60%) significantly increases mortality and adverse events in BAV patients, suggesting revised intervention thresholds.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Prognostic impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease remains understudied.
- BAV is a common congenital heart defect associated with various aortic pathologies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prognostic significance of LVEF in patients with BAV.
- To analyze LVEF impact based on the type of aortic valve dysfunction (AS, AR, MAVD).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 2,672 patients from an international BAV registry.
- Classification of patients by aortic valve dysfunction: isolated AS, isolated AR, mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD).
- Stratification of patients by LVEF to assess clinical outcomes.
Main Results:
- Reduced LVEF (<60%) correlated with increased all-cause mortality and composite endpoints (AVR/repair + mortality) in the overall BAV cohort.
- This association was observed in isolated AS and AR groups (<60% LVEF) and MAVD group (<55% LVEF).
- Multivariable analysis confirmed LVEF strata (50-59%, 30-49%, <30%) as significant predictors of mortality.
Conclusions:
- Lower LVEF (<60%) is a significant risk factor for adverse clinical outcomes in BAV patients.
- Current guideline LVEF cutoffs for intervention may need upward revision to 60% for AS/AR and 55% for MAVD.
- LVEF is a crucial prognostic marker in BAV disease management.
Background:
The prognostic impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease has not been previously studied.
Objectives:
The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic impact of LVEF in BAV patients according to the type of aortic valve dysfunction.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed the data collected in 2,672 patients included in an international registry of patients with BAV. Patients were classified according to the type of aortic valve dysfunction: isolated aortic stenosis (AS) (n = 749), isolated aortic regurgitation (AR) (n = 554), mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD) (n = 190), or no significant aortic valve dysfunction (n = 1,179; excluded from this analysis). The study population was divided according to LVEF strata to investigate its impact on clinical outcomes.
Results:
The risk of all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint of aortic valve replacement or repair (AVR) and all-cause mortality increased when LVEF was <60% in the whole cohort as well as in the AS and AR groups, and when LVEF was <55% in MAVD group. In multivariable analysis, LVEF strata were significantly associated with increased rate of mortality (LVEF 50%-59%: HR: 1.83 [95% CI: 1.09-3.07]; P = 0.022; LVEF 30%-49%: HR: 1.97 [95% CI: 1.13-3.41]; P = 0.016; LVEF <30%: HR: 4.20 [95% CI: 2.01-8.75]; P < 0.001; vs LVEF 60%-70%, reference group).
Conclusions:
In BAV patients, the risk of adverse clinical outcomes increases significantly when the LVEF is <60%. These findings suggest that LVEF cutoff values proposed in the guidelines to indicate intervention should be raised from 50% to 60% in AS or AR and 55% in MAVD.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction

