Model-informed experimental design recommendations for distinguishing intrinsic and acquired targeted therapeutic

Santiago D Cárdenas1, Constance J Reznik1,2, Ruchira Ranaweera3

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, USA.

Insights

Understanding cancer drug resistance is key to developing new treatments. This study uses mathematical models and tumor data to determine if resistance to cetuximab in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) can be predicted from tumor volume changes alone.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Mathematical Biology
  • Translational Medicine

Background:

  • Cancer drug resistance limits precision medicine's effectiveness.
  • Identifying the timing and mechanism of resistance is crucial for developing new therapeutics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if resistance mechanisms to cetuximab in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) can be inferred from tumor volume data alone.
  • To identify what additional data is needed to deduce resistance mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a family of mathematical models representing different resistance timings and mechanisms.
  • Fitting models to patient-derived tumor xenograft volumetric data.
  • Utilizing model selection and parameter sensitivity analyses.

Main Results:

  • Time-course volumetric data from a single cetuximab dose is insufficient to fully distinguish resistance models.
  • Initial resistance fraction and, in some cases, dose escalation data are necessary to infer resistance mechanisms.
  • Mathematical modeling combined with specific experimental data can elucidate resistance modes.

Conclusions:

  • Inferring cancer drug resistance mechanisms requires a combination of modeling and carefully selected experimental data.
  • Findings can guide future experimental designs for studying targeted cancer therapeutics.
  • Synergy between wet lab experiments and mathematical modeling is vital for advancing cancer therapy research.