Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

07:35
Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
Published on: June 8, 2020
7.0K
Meta-Analysis and Validation of a Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction Model Using Deep Sequenced Fecal Metagenomes
Mireia Obón-Santacana1,2,3, Joan Mas-Lloret1,2,3, David Bars-Cortina1,2
1Unit of Biomarkers and Suceptibility (UBS), Oncology Data Analytics Program (ODAP), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
Cancers
|September 9, 2022
Summary
A gut microbiome signature of 32 bacterial species can predict colorectal cancer (CRC) risk with good accuracy. However, this signature does not effectively identify precancerous lesions, suggesting microbes may be a consequence of tumors.
Area of Science:
- Microbiome Research
- Oncology
- Genomics
Background:
- The gut microbiome represents a modifiable risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC).
- Previous studies have explored the association between gut bacteria and CRC, necessitating meta-analyses and validation.
- Identifying reliable microbiome-based biomarkers is crucial for early CRC detection and prevention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify a gut microbiome signature for predicting colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and precancerous lesions.
- To validate predictive models using independent datasets, including the Colorectal Cancer Screening (COLSCREEN) study.
- To investigate the role of specific bacterial species in CRC development and progression.
Main Methods:
- Re-analysis of eight published stool sequencing datasets and a meta-analysis of microbial-wide associations (MWAS).
- Development of cross-validated LASSO predictive models to identify a CRC microbiome signature.
- Validation of the predictive models in the COLSCREEN dataset (n=156) within a CRC screening context.
Main Results:
- The MWAS meta-analysis identified 95 bacterial species significantly associated with CRC (FDR < 0.05).
- The LASSO model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (aROC) of 0.81 for CRC prediction, with validation at 0.75.
- The CRC-trained model showed limited predictive accuracy (aROC=0.52) for precancerous lesions, indicating microbial changes might be tumor-consequential.
Conclusions:
- A 32-bacterial species signature accurately predicts CRC but not precancerous lesions.
- The identified microbial signature's inability to predict early lesions suggests it may be a consequence of CRC rather than a cause.
- Future research should focus on developing microbiome signatures for both CRC and precancerous lesions for enhanced screening programs.

