Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
HAT4RD: Hierarchical Adversarial Training for Rumor Detection in Social Media
Shiwen Ni1, Jiawen Li1,2,3, Hung-Yu Kao1
1Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan.
Abstract:
With the development of social media, social communication has changed. While this facilitates people's communication and access to information, it also provides an ideal platform for spreading rumors. In normal or critical situations, rumors can affect people's judgment and even endanger social security. However, natural language is high-dimensional and sparse, and the same rumor may be expressed in hundreds of ways on social media. As such, the robustness and generalization of the current rumor detection model are in question. We proposed a novel hierarchical adversarial training method for rumor detection (HAT4RD) on social media. Specifically, HAT4RD is based on gradient ascent by adding adversarial perturbations to the embedding layers of post-level and event-level modules to deceive the detector. At the same time, the detector uses stochastic gradient descent to minimize the adversarial risk to learn a more robust model. In this way, the post-level and event-level sample spaces are enhanced, and we verified the robustness of our model under a variety of adversarial attacks. Moreover, visual experiments indicate that the proposed model drifts into an area with a flat loss landscape, thereby, leading to better generalization. We evaluate our proposed method on three public rumor datasets from two commonly used social platforms (Twitter and Weibo). Our experimental results demonstrate that our model achieved better results compared with the state-of-the-art methods.
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
Social Traps
Bullying
Social Facilitation
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
