Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Simultaneous Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: April 27, 2014
No robust online effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability
Steven Pillen1, Nicole Knodel2, Dominik Hermle2
1Department of Neurology & Stroke, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 27, 72076, Tübingen, Germany; Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Wallstraße 7-9, 55122, Mainz, Germany.
Abstract:
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used for over twenty years to modulate cortical (particularly motor corticospinal) excitability both during (online) and outlasting (offline) the stimulation, with the former effects associated to the latter. However, tDCS effects are highly variable, partially because stimulation intensity is commonly not adjusted individually (in contrast to transcranial magnetic stimulation, TMS). In Experiment 1, we therefore explored an empirical approach of personalizing tDCS intensity for the primary motor cortex (M1) based on dose-response curves (DRCs), individually relating tDCS Intensity (in steps from 0.3 to 2.0 mA) and Polarity (anodal, cathodal) to the online modulation of concurrent TMS motor evoked potentials (MEP), assessing DRC reliability across two separate days. No robust DRCs could be observed, neither at the individual nor at the group level, with the only robust effect being a (paradoxical) MEP facilitation during cathodal tDCS at 2.0 mA, but no modulation at traditional intensities of or near 1 mA. In Experiment 2, we therefore attempted to replicate the classical bidirectional online MEP modulation during 1 mA tDCS that had been reported by several of the early seminal tDCS papers. We either closely recreated stimulation parameters and temporal protocol of these original studies (Experiment 2A) or slightly modernized them according to current standards (Experiment 2B). In neither experiment did we observed any significant online MEP modulation. We conclude that an empirical titration of individually effective tDCS intensities may not be feasible as online tDCS effects do not appear to be sufficiently robust.
More Related Videos
13:56The Use of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as a Tool for the Measurement of Bi-hemispheric Transcranial Electric Stimulation Effects on Primary Motor Cortex Metabolism
Published on: November 19, 2014
10:11Updated Technique for Reliable, Easy, and Tolerated Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Including Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Published on: January 3, 2020