Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
Published on: February 7, 2025
Standardized Letter of Recommendation: Can Everyone Be Awesome?
Diana S Jodeh1, Jennifer L Miller-Ocuin1, Meridith Ginesi1
1University Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes & Effectiveness Center (UH-RISES), Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Objective:
Standardized letters of recommendation (SLOR) are hypothesized to decrease bias and provide consistent domains for evaluation. However, their ability to differentiate among applicants is unknown. The utilization and functionality of SLOR and the impact of SLOR domain rating on matching for colon and rectal surgery (CRS) residency applicants have yet to be assessed.
Design:
Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis were employed. Applicants were categorized into 3 groups; Top-tier(TT): applicants rated 100% Excellent/Very Good; Mid-Tier(MT) applicants rated 80-99% Excellent/Very Good; and Non-Top Tier(NTT) applicants rated <80% Excellent/Very Good.
Setting:
University of Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center.
Participants:
SLORs submitted to a single colorectal surgery residency in 2019 were analyzed RESULTS: A total of 101 applicants were included, 54 (53.5%) of the applicants were male. 75 (74.2%) applicants who applied to our residency matched into a CRS residency, compared to the national rate of 66%. Of the 101 applicants with SLOR, 54 (53.5%) were categorized as TT, 26 (25.7%) as MT, and 21(20.8%) as NTT. The univariable analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in research experience (p=0.029) and match status (p=0.01) between applicant tiers. There were no statistically significant differences between applicant-tier and demographics, foreign medical graduates (FMG), H-indices, ABSITE scores, type of residency, preliminary year, completing an unaccredited CRS, and applicants with an additional degree. On multivariable analysis age (OR=0.65; CI=0.48-0.87) and FMG applicants (OR=0.05; CI=0.01-0.44) were inversely associated with successfully matching. Compared to TT applicants, MT (OR=0.07; CI=0.01-0.57) and NTT (OR=0.04; CI=0.01-0.34) applicants were inversely associated with a successful match. Individuals who completed research prior to residency but after medical school was associated with successfully matching (p=0.009).
Conclusions:
The presence of MT and NTT ratings is associated with failure to match and may represent an area of concern for CRS programs rather than a tool to discern differences between candidates.
More Related Videos
07:56Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
Published on: September 19, 2019
12:55Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Surveys
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above...