Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies01:28

Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

188
Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) presents with diverse symptoms depending on the location and severity of the ulcer. Clinical manifestations of peptic ulcer include dull pain and a burning sensation in the mid-epigastric region.
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
188
Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management01:26

Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management

138
Medical treatment strategies for peptic ulcers encompass various methods. The primary goal of treatment is to diminish gastric acidity and strengthen mucosal defense mechanisms.
The therapeutic approach involves ensuring adequate rest, implementing drug therapy, promoting smoking cessation, making dietary modifications, and emphasizing long-term follow-up care.
Pharmacological management
The prevailing therapy for peptic ulcers involves a combination of managing the patient's current...
138
Peptic Ulcer Disease I: Introduction01:30

Peptic Ulcer Disease I: Introduction

271
Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD) is characterized by mucosal excavation in the esophagus, stomach, pylorus, or duodenum. It can manifest as acute or chronic based on the extent and duration of mucosal involvement.
An acute ulcer, marked by superficial erosion and minimal inflammation, swiftly resolves upon identifying and addressing the underlying cause. In contrast, a chronic ulcer persists, potentially eroding through the muscular wall and forming fibrous tissue.
Peptic ulcers can also be...
271
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care01:25

Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care

394
Surgical management and nursing care are crucial in treating Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD). Here is an organized and enhanced overview of the surgical interventions and the associated nursing care for PUD:
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
394
Peptic Ulcer Disease II: Pathophysiology01:28

Peptic Ulcer Disease II: Pathophysiology

745
Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD) is characterized by the development of ulcers in the stomach or duodenal mucosa. Its pathophysiology is complex, involving a balance between damaging and protective elements.
Damaging agents such as Helicobacter pylori, gastric acid, pepsin, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can weaken the mucosal defense, allowing hydrogen ions to infiltrate back and harm epithelial cells.
745
Pathophysiology of Peptic Ulcer Disease: Mucosal Defense Factors01:24

Pathophysiology of Peptic Ulcer Disease: Mucosal Defense Factors

508
Peptic ulcer disease, commonly called PUD, represents a multifaceted condition characterized by disruptions in the lining of the gastrointestinal (GI)  tract. Central to the protection of the gastrointestinal lining is the mucosal-bicarbonate barrier. This physiological defense mechanism is a formidable shield against the corrosive effects of gastric acid and pepsin secretion in the stomach. Its role is pivotal in maintaining the structural integrity of the stomach's inner lining.
508

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Friend and Confidant Thresholds: Social Network Size as a Mediator Between Marital Status and Major Depressive Disorder.

Depression and anxiety·2026
Same author

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Older Adult Patients Aged ≥75 Years With Early Gastric Cancer After Endoscopic Resections: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Journal of gastric cancer·2026
Same author

Neoadjuvant Danburstotug (IMC-001) therapy in gastric, esophageal, and hepatocellular carcinoma: the NeoChance phase II study.

NPJ precision oncology·2026
Same author

Relationships Among Type D Personality, Symptoms, Depression and Anxiety, and Quality of Life in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

The journal of nursing research : JNR·2026
Same author

Optimal Sampling Site for the Diagnosis of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> Infection with the Rapid Urease Test: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Gut and liver·2026
Same author

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for synchronous early hypopharyngeal and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case report with 24-month follow-up.

International journal of surgery case reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Systematic Scoring Analysis for Intestinal Inflammation in a Murine Dextran Sodium Sulfate-Induced Colitis Model
09:11

Systematic Scoring Analysis for Intestinal Inflammation in a Murine Dextran Sodium Sulfate-Induced Colitis Model

Published on: February 14, 2021

9.6K

Scoring systems for predicting clinical outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding.

Jin Hee Noh1, Boram Cha1,2, Ji Yong Ahn1

  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Medicine
|September 10, 2022
PubMed
Summary

The Rockall score (RS), Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), and AIMS65 score effectively predict outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding. RS is particularly valuable for forecasting rebleeding and survival in these patients.

More Related Videos

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
15:49

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 16, 2013

31.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
03:05

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors

Published on: February 16, 2024

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Systematic Scoring Analysis for Intestinal Inflammation in a Murine Dextran Sodium Sulfate-Induced Colitis Model
09:11

Systematic Scoring Analysis for Intestinal Inflammation in a Murine Dextran Sodium Sulfate-Induced Colitis Model

Published on: February 14, 2021

9.6K
Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
15:49

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 16, 2013

31.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
03:05

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors

Published on: February 16, 2024

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Clinical Medicine
  • Medical Statistics

Background:

  • Peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) management relies on accurate risk stratification.
  • Existing scoring systems like Rockall score (RS), Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), and AIMS65 require further validation for predicting clinical outcomes in PUB patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the predictive performance of RS, GBS, and AIMS65 for key clinical outcomes in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.
  • To compare the effectiveness of these scoring systems in stratifying patient risk and guiding prognosis.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 682 peptic ulcer bleeding patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (2013-2017).
  • Calculation of Area Under the Receiver-Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) for RS, GBS, and AIMS65 to predict rebleeding, hospitalization, blood transfusion, and mortality.
  • Statistical comparison of scoring system performance using logistic regression and survival analysis.

Main Results:

  • The Rockall score demonstrated superior prediction for rebleeding compared to GBS and AIMS65.
  • Glasgow-Blatchford score showed the best prediction for blood transfusion requirements.
  • AIMS65 exhibited the highest AUROC for mortality prediction.
  • The Rockall score was independently associated with increased risk of rebleeding and mortality.

Conclusions:

  • The Rockall score, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and AIMS65 are valuable tools for risk stratification in peptic ulcer bleeding.
  • The Rockall score is a significant independent predictor of rebleeding and overall survival in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.