Validating a geospatial healthfulness index with self-reported chronic disease and health outcomes

Leveraging community engagement from past research may yield frameworks on which to build new inquiries. We previously integrated community voice into the development of a healthfulness index to increase awareness of social determinants of health in the built environment and inform deployment of public health interventions in the Flint (Michigan, USA) Center for Health Equity Solutions. Here we combine the healthfulness index with self-reported chronic disease and health outcomes (n = 12,279) from a community-based healthcare entity, the Genesee Health Plan. The healthfulness index purports to predict how health-promoting a neighborhood is based on many spatially varying characteristics; by linking our health plan data to this index, we validate the effectiveness of the healthfulness index. After geocoding all enrollees and joining their healthfulness scores, we conducted a series of logistic regressions to compare the relationship between self-reported outcomes and healthfulness. Matching the two intervention projects of our center (revolving around healthy eating & physical activity in project 1 and mental health sustainment & substance use prevention in project 2), our analyses also focused on classes of outcomes related to a) cardiovascular disease and b) mental health. In only select cases, higher (better) healthfulness scores from each project were independently associated with better cardiovascular and mental health outcomes, controlling for age, race, and sex. Generally, however, healthfulness did not add predictive strength to the association between health and sociodemographic covariates. Even so, the use of composite healthfulness indices to describe the health-promoting or degrading qualities of a neighborhood could be valuable in identifying differences in health outcomes. Future researchers could further explore healthcare claims datasets to increase understanding of the links between healthfulness and health outcomes. This and future work will be valuable in advocacy toward additional healthfulness indices to aid other communities in enriching understanding between the built environment and health.