Drip and Ship versus Mothership Model in the Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke: A Propensity-Matched Real-World Analysis...

The superiority of mechanical thrombectomy and intravenous thrombolysis versus intravenous thrombolysis alone for acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusions has been established. This treatment can be organized into 2 models: drip and ship (DS) versus mothership (MS). We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) data to compare the outcomes between these models in real-world settings.

NIS data were queried for 2017-2018 and propensity matching was used to match the differences. Outcomes for each group (disability at discharge and procedural complications) were compared.

A total of 1226 patients were included in analysis (DS, n = 540; MS, n = 686) and groups were matched with respect to age, gender, and comorbidities. A total of 930 patients were included in the final analysis after propensity matching (DS, n = 465, MS, n = 465). The mean age in the DS group was 68.9 years (standard deviation [SD], 14.7) and 69.4 years (SD, 14) in the MS group (P = 0.752). The mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 16.75 (SD, 6.07) in the DS group and 16.54 (SD, 5.99) in the MS group (P = 0.478). At discharge, minimal disability was noted in 22.4% in the DS group versus 26.2% in the MS group (P = 0.293). In-hospital mortality was lower in the MS group (8.8% vs. 7.1%; P = 0.32). The intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) rates were higher in the DS group (ICH, 24.3% vs. 18.7%; IVH, 2.4% vs. 0.9%) (ICH, P = 0.038; IVH, P = 0.068).

Analyzing the efficacy and safety profile of DS versus MS models with the NIS database showed a trend toward better discharge outcomes and lower mortality for the MS group, although it did not reach statistical significance.