Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 16, 2013
A novel multi-criteria decision-making approach for prioritization of elective surgeries through formulation of
Hassan Sikandar Rana1, Muhammad Umer1, Uzma Hassan2
1Department of Business & Engineering Management, Sir Syed CASE Institute of Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Background:
Publicly funded healthcare system has long non-manageable elective surgery waiting lists due to the non-existence of systematic mathematical modelling that can assess the relative priority of patients on elective surgery waiting lists thus denying the provision of surgical support to the patients with higher urgency. Mostly the patients of general surgery are entertain with highly subjective "time-honoured" methods that are inadequate to measure and compare the urgency of surgical procedure.
Objective:
A methodology of assigning priorities to patients on elective surgery waiting lists has been presented in this paper using weighted criteria objectives. The objectives hve been chosen and assigned weights based on hospital conditions, and in consultation with the surgeons in hospital in Pakistan.
Methods:
The proposed methodology presents two working contributions; first, a scoring mechanism based on MeNTS scoring system with weighted criterion that objectively translate the condition of patient prior to the surgical procedure; and second, a patient prioritization methodology to select patients for surgeries according to the corresponding scores. Detailed simulation results from actual patient data have been presented to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology, and its applicability and ease of use has been tested in real-time by surgeons while providing consultations to their patients.
Results:
The proposed methodology outperforms the traditional "first-come-first-serve" methodology as there was a 30% reduction in average waiting time in elective surgery waiting lists (from 4.246 to 2.956 days) with 103 (90%) of patients being entertained before or within the unprioritized surgeries time span, with 94 patients having surgery within 1 day of being on waiting list (an increase of 47 patients). Moreover, transparency and equity were also found in the adaptation of this strategy to prioritize the elective surgery patients.
Conclusions:
Prioritizing patients on elective surgery waiting lists is an important concern in surgical field. In most of the methodologies presented in earlier research, prioritization of patients for surgery is carried out subjectively. This study shows that the proposed technique has the potential to decrease the waiting times for patients on elective surgery waiting lists, as well as be presented as an objective methodology for preparing the elective surgery waiting lists to increase the transparency in waiting list.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
10:42A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Weighted Mean
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...