Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

07:31
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
7.2K
Does capping social security harm health? A natural experiment in the UK
Aaron Reeves1,2, Mark Fransham1,2, Kitty Stewart3
1Department of Social Policy and Intervention University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Social Policy & Administration
|September 12, 2022
Summary
Lowering the UK's benefit cap increased depression and anxiety risks for capped households. This policy may worsen mental ill health and hinder employment for those out of work.
Area of Science:
- Social Policy
- Mental Health Research
- Public Health
Background:
- The UK's benefit cap limits social security for households without full-time employment.
- Understanding the mental health impact of welfare policies is crucial for public health.
- Previous research has not fully explored the consequences of the benefit cap reduction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the mental health effects of the 2016 reduction in the UK's benefit cap.
- To assess the impact on individuals at risk of being capped versus those not at risk.
- To determine if the policy change correlates with increased mental ill health.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing a natural policy experiment design.
- Comparing mental health outcomes of individuals at risk of the benefit cap with a control group.
- Analyzing data from approximately 900,000 individuals before and after the policy change.
Main Results:
- A 2.6 percentage point increase in depression or anxiety prevalence was observed among those at risk of being capped.
- (95% confidence interval: 1.33-3.88) compared to those at low risk.
- The findings suggest a direct link between the benefit cap reduction and poorer mental health outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Reducing the benefit cap may inadvertently increase mental ill health among vulnerable populations.
- The policy could create barriers to re-entering the labour market for unemployed individuals.
- Further investigation into the long-term socioeconomic and health consequences is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Censoring Survival Data
203
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
203
What is an Experiment?
12.1K
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
12.1K
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
175
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
175
Factors Affecting Illness
4.3K
When a person's physical, emotional, intellectual, social development or spiritual functioning is compromised, this deviation from a healthy normal state is called illness. Illness creates stress that in turn harms individuals. Irritation, anger, denial, hopelessness, and fear are behavioral and emotional changes an individual experiences in the phases of illness. A variety of factors influence a person's health and well-being.
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
4.3K
Regression Toward the Mean
6.4K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.4K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
539
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
539

