Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Restarting Stalled Replication Forks02:37

Restarting Stalled Replication Forks

5.9K
DNA replication is initiated at sites containing predefined DNA sequences known as origins of replication. DNA is unwound at these sites by the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicase and other factors such as Cdc45 and the associated GINS complex.The unwound single strands are protected by replication protein A (RPA) until DNA polymerase starts synthesizing DNA at the 5’ end of the strand in the same direction as the replication fork. To prevent the replication fork from falling apart,...
5.9K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.4K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.4K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.4K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.4K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

2.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
2.1K
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

6.5K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
6.5K
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

12.1K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
12.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Progression of Vestibular Deficits Following Moderate-Intensity Blast Overpressure in Rats.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2026
Same author

Regeneration of sensory hair cells in mature mammals.

Current topics in developmental biology·2025
Same author

How Might a 'Philosopher's Toolkit' Help Advance Neuroscience? Let's Ask Some Neuroscientists.

The European journal of neuroscience·2025
Same author

When remediating one artifact results in another: control, confounders, and correction.

History and philosophy of the life sciences·2024
Same author

Hodgkin's and Huxley's own assessments of their "quantitative description" of nerve membrane current.

History and philosophy of the life sciences·2023
Same author

New research tools suggest a "levels-less" image of the behaving organism and dissolution of the reduction vs. anti-reduction dispute.

Frontiers in psychology·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 29, 2025

The Replica Set Method: A High-throughput Approach to Quantitatively Measure Caenorhabditis elegans Lifespan
11:58

The Replica Set Method: A High-throughput Approach to Quantitatively Measure Caenorhabditis elegans Lifespan

Published on: June 29, 2018

9.5K

When should researchers cite study differences in response to a failure to replicate?

David Colaço1, John Bickle2,3, Bradley Walters4,5

  • 1Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Biology & Philosophy
|September 12, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Failures to replicate neuroscience studies can be explained by component differences, but only if these differences are relevant and impact outcomes. Not all differences matter for scientific reproducibility and translation.

Keywords:
ExperimentModel organismsNeuroscienceReplicationTranslation

More Related Videos

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

4.6K
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 29, 2025

The Replica Set Method: A High-throughput Approach to Quantitatively Measure Caenorhabditis elegans Lifespan
11:58

The Replica Set Method: A High-throughput Approach to Quantitatively Measure Caenorhabditis elegans Lifespan

Published on: June 29, 2018

9.5K
An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

4.6K
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Scientific Replication
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Replication failures are common in scientific research.
  • Differences in experimental components are often cited as explanations for replication failures.
  • Neuroscience studies, particularly in spinal cord injury research, face challenges with reproducibility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the validity of "mismatch explanations" for replication failures in neuroscience.
  • To establish criteria for defensible mismatch explanations.
  • To analyze the implications of mismatch explanations for scientific translation and epistemic aims.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a corpus of failed replication studies in neuroscience, specifically focusing on spinal cord injury research.
  • Development of a framework for evaluating mismatch explanations based on "difference makers" and "relevant differences" criteria.
  • Case study analysis of specific examples to illustrate the application of the framework.

Main Results:

  • Identified that not all component differences between studies are meaningful explanations for outcome discrepancies.
  • Proposed that a defensible mismatch explanation requires the component mismatch to be a "difference maker" for the outcome mismatch.
  • Highlighted that components must be "relevantly different" relative to the original study's scope for the explanation to be valid.

Conclusions:

  • A rigorous evaluation of mismatch explanations is crucial for understanding replication failures.
  • Overemphasis on superficial differences can obscure the representativeness of original findings and hinder translational goals.
  • The proposed framework aids in discerning meaningful differences from inconsequential ones, supporting robust scientific progress.