Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Association between visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and adverse events in coronary artery disease patients
Tsung-Ying Tsai1,2, Hsin-Bang Leu1,3,4,5, Pai-Feng Hsu1,3,4,5
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Insights
Blood pressure variability (BPV) increases cardiovascular risks in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Stable blood pressure is crucial for better outcomes in these patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Blood pressure variability (BPV) is a known cardiovascular risk factor.
- The association between BPV and outcomes in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between pre- and post-PCI blood pressure variability and cardiovascular outcomes in CAD patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 2762 CAD patients undergoing PCI.
- Calculation of systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressure variability using standard deviation.
- Primary endpoint: Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) + Heart Failure Hospitalization (HHF). Secondary endpoint: MACE.
Main Results:
- Both pre- and post-PCI BPV were significantly associated with adverse cardiovascular events, independent of comorbidities and mean blood pressure.
- Increased systolic BPV correlated with higher risks of MACE + HHF, MACE, HHF, and cardiovascular death.
- BPV demonstrated superior prognostic value compared to mean blood pressure for predicting outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Blood pressure variability is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in CAD patients after PCI.
- Maintaining stable blood pressure is critical for improving outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.
Abstract:
Blood pressure variability (BPV) is independently associated with higher cardiovascular risks. However, whether BPV is associated with poor outcomes for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remained undetermined. We aimed to investigate the relationship between BPV and the outcomes of CAD patients undergoing PCI. Two thousand seven hundred and sixty-two CAD patients (1938 males, mean age 69.6 ± 12.9) who received PCI at Taipei Veterans General Hospital from 2006 to 2015 with multiple blood pressure measurements before and after the index PCI were enrolled. We calculated the standard deviation of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and pulse pressure as parameters of BPV. The primary endpoint was the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE comprising of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and non-fatal stroke] and heart failure hospitalization (HHF). The key secondary endpoint was MACE. Both pre-PCI and post-PCI BPV were associated with CV events even after adjusting for co-morbidities and mean blood pressure. In Cox analysis, for every 1 mmHg increase in systolic BPV, the hazard ratio for the MACE + HHF, MACE, HHF, and cardiovascular death was 1.04 (95%CI: 1.03-1.05), 1.04 (95%CI: 1.02-1.05), 1.05 (95%CI: 1.04-1.06), and 1.06 (95%CI: 1.03-1.09), respectively. The association between BPV and cardiovascular risk is independent of blood pressure control status. The prognostic value of BPV was superior to mean blood pressure in both pre-PCI and post-PCI period. BPV is independently associated with cardiovascular events after PCI and has a better prognostic value than mean blood pressure suggesting the importance of maintaining stable blood pressure for CAD patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)

