Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

57.5K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
57.5K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

61.9K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
61.9K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

123
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
123
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

538
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
538
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving01:06

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving

4.3K
In multiple dimensions, the conservation of momentum applies in each direction independently. Hence, to solve collisions in multiple dimensions, we should write down the momentum conservation in each direction separately. To help understand collisions in multiple dimensions, consider an example.
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...
4.3K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.6K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Studies with impossible languages falsify LMs as models of human language.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Correlations without causation do not support claims of human-LLM reasoning alignment.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

The successes and failures of artificial neural networks (ANNs) highlight the importance of innate linguistic priors for human language acquisition.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

Rules in the mist: Emerging probabilistic rules in uncertain categorization.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Adapting to time: Why nature may have evolved a diverse set of neurons.

PLoS computational biology·2024
Same author

The role of conventionality and design in children's function judgments about malfunctioning artifacts.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

614

Can deep convolutional neural networks support relational reasoning in the same-different task?

Guillermo Puebla1,2, Jeffrey S Bowers1,3

  • 1School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, UK.

Journal of Vision
|September 12, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) can classify same-different visual reasoning tasks but only with pixel-level similarity. Performance significantly drops when test image distributions shift, suggesting limitations in relational reasoning for current DCNNs.

More Related Videos

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.1K
Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
13:19

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment

Published on: March 13, 2021

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

614
RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.1K
Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
13:19

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment

Published on: March 13, 2021

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Vision
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Same-different visual reasoning is crucial for abstract thought.
  • Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) are increasingly tested for this skill, but results are debated.
  • Previous studies often used training and testing data from the same pixel distribution, limiting conclusions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the capacity of DCNNs for relational same-different visual reasoning.
  • To determine if DCNNs can generalize same-different classification beyond pixel-level similarities.
  • To assess the robustness of DCNNs and relation networks when faced with distribution shifts.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted simulations using ResNet-based DCNN architectures.
  • Tested DCNN performance on same-different classification with varying pixel-level distributions between training and testing data.
  • Evaluated a relation network architecture on the same tasks.
  • Included expanded training regimes and multitask learning contexts.

Main Results:

  • ResNet models achieved same-different classification accuracy only when test images matched training images at the pixel level.
  • Performance substantially decreased when the testing distribution shifted, even without altering object relations.
  • These limitations persisted across expanded training strategies and multitask learning.
  • Relation networks exhibited similar constraints.

Conclusions:

  • Current DCNNs, including ResNet and relation networks, struggle with generalizing same-different visual reasoning beyond pixel-level similarities.
  • Learning abstract relational concepts appears to be beyond the scope of existing DCNN architectures.
  • Further research is needed to develop models capable of robust visual relational reasoning.