Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.5K
Average abundancy of cooperation in multi-player games with random payoffs
Dhaker Kroumi1, Sabin Lessard2
1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, 31261, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. dhaker.kroumi@kfupm.edu.sa.
Journal of Mathematical Biology
|September 12, 2022
Summary
This study shows that random payoff fluctuations can increase cooperation in social dilemmas. Increased payoff variance for defectors or decreased variance for cooperators boosts cooperation levels.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Game Theory
- Mathematical Biology
- Population Dynamics
Background:
- Examines interactions in finite groups with time-varying random payoffs.
- Models population updates using a Moran birth-death process.
- Considers cooperation and defection strategies with recurrent symmetric mutation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To derive an approximation for the average abundance of cooperation at equilibrium.
- To analyze the impact of payoff variances and covariances on cooperation levels.
- To investigate specific social dilemmas: public goods, stag hunt, and snowdrift games.
Main Methods:
- Derivation of a first-order approximation for cooperation abundance.
- Analysis of selection-mutation equilibrium under fluctuating payoffs.
- Application of the model to classic social dilemma games.
Main Results:
- Increasing defection payoff variance or decreasing cooperation payoff variance enhances cooperation.
- Payoff covariance effects depend on the number of cooperators.
- Reduced scaled variance or increased scaled covariance of benefits/costs favors cooperation in stag hunt and snowdrift games.
Conclusions:
- Payoff randomness significantly influences the prevalence of cooperation in evolutionary games.
- Group size can alter the balance between cooperation and defection, especially under weak selection.
- Mutation rate has a minor impact on the equilibrium strategy abundance.
Related Concept Videos
Expected Value
4.1K
The expected value is known as the "long-term" average or mean. This means that over the long term of experimenting over and over, you would expect this average. The expected average is represented by the symbol μ. It is calculated as follows:
4.1K
Social Loafing
35.6K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
35.6K
Randomized Experiments
7.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.1K
Unusual Results
3.3K
Unusual results are those that have a very low chance of occurring. Unusual results can be identified using probabilities and the range rule of thumb. In problems involving probability, unusual results can be observed in 2 instances – an unusually high number of successes or an unusually low number of successes.
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ from the mean, μ is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value =...
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ from the mean, μ is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value =...
3.3K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
3.4K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.4K
Binomial Probability Distribution
11.3K
A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
11.3K

