Protective effects of E. coli Nissle 1917 on chickens infected with Salmonella pullorum

The probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) plays an important role in regulating the microbial components of the gut and preventing inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. Currently, the long-term use of antibiotics for the treatment of lethal white diarrhea in chicks caused by Salmonella has led to increased morbidity and mutation rates. Therefore, we want to use EcN as an antibiotic alternative as an alternative approach to prevent Salmonella-induced white diarrhea in chickens. To date, there are no reports of EcN being used for the prevention and control of Salmonella pullorum (S. pullorum) in chickens. In vitro, pretreatment with EcN significantly decreased the cellular invasion of S. pullorum CVCC533 in a chicken fibroblast (DF-1) cell model. Then, 0-day-old egg-laying chickens were orally inoculated with EcN at a dose of 10⁹ CFU/100 μL at either Day 1 (EcN1) or both Day 1 and Day 4 (EcN2). Then, S. pullorum CVCC533 was used to challenge the cells at a dose of 1.0 × 10⁷ CFU/100 μL on Day 8. Next, the body weights and survival rates were recorded for 14 consecutive days, and the colonization of S. pullorum in the spleen and liver at 7 days post-challenge (dpc) was determined. Chicken feces were also collected at 2, 4, 6 and 8 dpc to evaluate the excretion of pathogenic bacteria in feces. The liver, duodenum and rectum samples were collected and analyzed by pathological histology at 7 dpc to evaluate the protective effect of EcN on the mucosa, villi and crypts of the small intestine. The spleen and bursa were collected, and the immune organ index was calculated. In addition, the contents of the cecum of chicks were collected at 7 dpc for 16S rRNA sequencing to detect the distribution of microbial communities in the intestine. The results showed that EcN was able to protect against CVCC533 challenge, as shown by decreased body weight loss, mortality and shedding of pathogenic bacteria in fecal samples in the EcN1 plus Salmonella challenge group (EcN1S) but not the EcN2 plus Salmonella challenge group (EcN2S). The pathogenic changes in the liver, duodenum and rectum also demonstrated that one dose but not two doses of EcN effectively prolonged the length of the pilus with decreased crypt depth, indicating its protective effects against S. pullorum. In addition, the 16S rRNA sequencing results suggested that EcN could enlarge the diversity of intestinal flora, decrease the abundance of pathogenic bacteria and increase the abundance of beneficial bacteria, such as Lactobacillus. In conclusion, EcN has shown moderate protection against S. pullorum challenge in chickens.