Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.4K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.4K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.5K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.5K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

7.2K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
7.2K
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

7.8K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
7.8K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

271
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
271
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

6.0K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
6.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multisite Real-World Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Integrated Generative Artificial Intelligence Tool for Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Happy birthday, dear TSACO: congratulations on the 10-year anniversary of Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open (TSACO).

Trauma surgery & acute care open·2026
Same author

Readmissions within 90 days in patients with diabetic foot ulcers undergoing soft tissue reconstruction: risk factor analysis.

Journal of wound care·2026
Same author

Right-Sizing Trauma System Expansion Through an Equity Lens.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Neurosurgical and prehospital timing in severe traumatic brain injury: Insights from the prospective Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium hypertonic saline trial.

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery·2026
Same author

Age-related differences in surgical outcomes for traumatic central cord syndrome: a multi-institutional causal machine learning analysis.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.6K

Facts and Fallacy of Benchmark Performance Indicators.

James P Byrne1, Elliott R Haut2

  • 1Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Sheikh Zayed 6107 1800 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

Advances in Surgery
|September 12, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Performance benchmarking uses data to compare hospital and surgeon outcomes, addressing variability in healthcare quality. This approach is key to improving patient care standards across the United States.

Keywords:
BenchmarkingPerformance improvementPerformance indicatorQualityRisk-adjustmentSurgery

More Related Videos

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

2.3K
Making Record-efficiency SnS Solar Cells by Thermal Evaporation and Atomic Layer Deposition
14:01

Making Record-efficiency SnS Solar Cells by Thermal Evaporation and Atomic Layer Deposition

Published on: May 22, 2015

42.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.6K
Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

2.3K
Making Record-efficiency SnS Solar Cells by Thermal Evaporation and Atomic Layer Deposition
14:01

Making Record-efficiency SnS Solar Cells by Thermal Evaporation and Atomic Layer Deposition

Published on: May 22, 2015

42.9K

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Performance Measurement

Background:

  • Healthcare quality and patient outcomes exhibit significant variability.
  • There is a recognized need for systematic methods to enhance healthcare delivery.
  • Performance benchmarking has emerged as a strategy to address these issues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the evolution and current status of performance benchmarking in the U.S.
  • To examine the methodologies employed in healthcare performance benchmarking.
  • To identify potential challenges and limitations associated with benchmarking initiatives.

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical and current practices in healthcare performance benchmarking.
  • Analysis of methodologies for risk-adjusted outcome comparisons.
  • Discussion of data requirements and quality considerations.

Main Results:

  • Performance benchmarking is a widely adopted tool for quality assessment.
  • Risk-adjusted outcome comparisons provide insights into institutional performance.
  • Methodologies vary, with ongoing refinement to improve accuracy and utility.

Conclusions:

  • Benchmarking offers a valuable framework for driving healthcare quality improvements.
  • Careful consideration of methodologies and potential pitfalls is essential for effective implementation.
  • Continued development and application of benchmarking are crucial for advancing patient care.