Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Covariate inclusion in factor mixture modeling: Evaluating one-step and three-step approaches under model
Yan Wang1, Chunhua Cao2, Eunsook Kim3
1Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, 01854, USA. Yan_Wang1@uml.edu.
Factor mixture modeling (FMM) uses covariates to identify population subgroups. The one-step FMM approach generally outperforms the three-step method, especially with poor class separation or model misspecification.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral and social sciences
- Quantitative psychology
- Statistical modeling
Background:
- Factor mixture modeling (FMM) is a statistical technique used to uncover unobserved heterogeneity within populations.
- Incorporating covariates into FMM helps elucidate the characteristics and formation of identified latent subgroups or classes.
- Evaluating different covariate inclusion strategies is crucial for accurate subgroup analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of one-step and three-step covariate inclusion approaches in Factor Mixture Modeling (FMM).
- To assess these methods under conditions of correct specification, misspecification, and overfitting of covariate effects.
- To provide guidance on selecting appropriate FMM covariate strategies based on study conditions.
Main Methods:
- A Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to evaluate FMM covariate inclusion methods.
- Three scenarios were simulated: correct specification, model misspecification, and model overfitting regarding direct covariate effects on factors.
- Performance was assessed by comparing the one-step and three-step FMM approaches across these simulated conditions.
Main Results:
- The one-step and three-step FMM approaches performed comparably with large class separation and correct covariate effect specification.
- The one-step FMM demonstrated superior class enumeration performance when class separation was poor.
- The one-step FMM exhibited greater robustness against misspecification or overfitting of direct covariate effects.
Conclusions:
- The choice between one-step and three-step FMM covariate inclusion depends on the degree of class separation and sample size.
- The one-step FMM is recommended for situations with poor class separation or potential model misspecification.
- A large sample size (>=1000) and the use of sample size-adjusted BIC (saBIC) for class enumeration are advised for robust FMM analyses.
Related Concept Videos
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Factorial Design
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model
When a drug is administered through a constant intravenous infusion and eliminated via nonlinear pharmacokinetics, it follows zero-order input. For example, oral drugs undergo first-order absorption upon administration and are eliminated through nonlinear pharmacokinetics.
In the case of subcutaneously administered drugs,...

