Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
Published on: November 16, 2018
In Vivo Analysis of the Immune Response to Strontium- and Copper-doped Bioglass
Mike Barbeck1,2, Said Alkildani3,2, Armando Mandlule4
1Clinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany; mike.barbeck@med.uni-rostock.de.
Background:
Bioglass is a highly adoptable bone substitute material which can be combined with so-called therapeutic ions. However, knowledge is poor regarding the influence of therapeutic ions on immune reactions and associated bone healing. Thus, the aim of this work was to investigate the influence of strontium- and copper-doped bioglass on the induction of M1 and M2 macrophages, as well as vascularization.
Materials And Methods:
Two types of alkali glass were produced based on ICIE16 bioglass via the melt-quench method with the addition of 5 wt% copper or strontium (ICIE16-Cu and ICIE16-Sr). Pure ICIE16 and 45S5 bioglass were used as control materials. The ion release and chemical composition of the bioglass were investigated, and an in vivo experiment was subcutaneously performed on Sprague-Dawley rats.
Results:
Scanning electron microscopy revealed significant differences in the surface morphology of the bioglass materials. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed the efficiency of the doping process by showing the ion-release kinetics. ICIE16-Cu exhibited a higher ion release than ICIE16-Sr. ICIE16-Cu induced low immune cell migration and triggered not only a low number of M1 and M2 macrophages but also of blood vessels. ICIE16-Sr induced higher numbers of M1 macrophages after 30 days. Both bioglass types induced numbers of M2 macrophages comparable with those found in the control groups.
Conclusion:
Bioglass doping with copper and strontium did not significantly influence the foreign body response nor vascularization of the implantation bed in vivo. However, all the studied bioglass materials seemed to be biocompatible.
More Related Videos
14:49Direct and Indirect Culture Methods for Studying Biodegradable Implant Materials In Vitro
Published on: April 15, 2022
18:40Combined In vivo Optical and µCT Imaging to Monitor Infection, Inflammation, and Bone Anatomy in an Orthopaedic Implant Infection in Mice
Published on: October 16, 2014