Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Manufacturing Abdominal Aorta Hydrogel Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms for Ultrasound Elastography Validation
Published on: September 19, 2018
Chronic kidney disease impacts outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
Alejandro Pizano1, Carla K Scott1, Jesus Porras-Colon1
1Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Insights
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) severity significantly impacts survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Patients with advanced CKD or on dialysis face higher mortality risks, regardless of open repair or endovascular repair approach.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Nephrology
- Public Health
Background:
- Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are linked to poorer outcomes following abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.
- Stratifying outcomes by CKD severity and dialysis dependence is crucial for understanding risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the outcomes of AAA repair (open and endovascular) stratified by CKD severity and dialysis status.
- To identify predictors of mortality in patients undergoing AAA repair with varying degrees of renal function.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 53,867 elective infrarenal open aneurysm repair (OAR) and endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) cases from January 2003 to September 2020.
- Patients were categorized into CKD stages 1-2, 3a, 3b, 4-5, and dialysis dependence.
- Cox multivariate regression models were used to determine predictors of perioperative and 1-year mortality.
Main Results:
- EVAR use increased significantly from 52% to 91% between 2003 and 2020.
- Patients with CKD stages 4-5 and those on dialysis had significantly higher 1-year mortality rates after both OAR and EVAR compared to CKD stages 1-2.
- Worsening CKD severity and dialysis dependence were independent predictors of worse 1-year survival after EVAR and OAR.
Conclusions:
- CKD severity is a critical predictor of mortality after AAA repair, irrespective of the surgical approach.
- Open repair poses a high perioperative mortality risk for patients with advanced CKD (stages 4-5) or ESRD.
- Individualized decision-making, potentially including higher repair thresholds for patients with eGFR < 45, is recommended.
Objective:
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease are traditionally associated with worse outcomes after endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This study stratifies outcomes of AAA repair by approach, CKD severity, and dialysis dependence.
Methods:
All patients undergoing elective infrarenal open aneurysm repair (OAR) and endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with preoperative renal function data captured by the Vascular Quality Initiative between January 2003 and September 2020 were analyzed. Patients were stratified by CKD class as follows: CKD stages 1 and 2, CKD stage 3a, CKD stage 3b, CKD stages 4 and 5, and dialysis. Primary outcomes were perioperative and 1-year mortality. Predictors of survival were identified by Cox multivariate regression models.
Results:
In total, 53,867 elective AAA repairs were identified: 5396 (10%) OARs and 48,471 (90%) EVARs. Most patients were White (90%) and male (81%), with a mean age of 73 ± 9 years. Patients who underwent EVAR were older and had more comorbidities. The use of elective EVAR for AAA increased from 52% in 2003 to 91% in 2020 (P < .001). The OAR cohort had more perioperative complications and short-term mortality. The CKD 1 and 2 group had the highest 1-year survival compared with the other groups after both OAR and EVAR. On Cox regression analysis, after EVAR, compared with CKD 1 and 2, worsening CKD stage (CKD 3a: hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.68; P = .13; CKD 3b: HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.23-2.45; P < .050; CKD 4-5: HR, 3.23; 95% CI, 2.13-4.88; P < .001), and dialysis (HR, 4.48; 95% CI, 1.90-10.6; P < .001) were independently associated with worse 1-year survival rates. After OAR, compared with CKD 1 and 2, worsening CKD stage (CKD 3a: HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.96-1.20; P = .20; CKD 3b: HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.41-1.81; P < .001; CKD 4-5: HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 2.39-3.41; P < .001), and dialysis (HR, 3.79; 95% CI, 3.01-4.76; P < .001) were independently associated with worse 1-year survival rates.
Conclusions:
Regardless of the treatment approach, CKD severity is an important predictor of perioperative and 1-year mortality rates after infrarenal AAA repair and may reflect the natural history of CKD. Open repair is associated with high perioperative mortality risk in patients with CKD stages 4 and 5, as well as end-stage renal disease. Individualization of patient decision-making is especially important in patients with a glomerular filtration rate of less than 45 and perhaps consideration should be given to raising the threshold for elective AAA repair in these patients. Further studies focusing on appropriate size threshold for repair in these patients may be warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction

