Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

At-Risk Butterfly Captive Propagation Programs to Enhance Life History Knowledge and Effective Ex Situ Conservation Techniques
Published on: February 11, 2020
Separating Proactive Conservation from Species Listing Decisions.
Adrienne I Kovach1, Amanda E Cheeseman2, Jonathan B Cohen3
1Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA. akovach@unh.edu.
Proactive Conservation efforts, while popular, may overestimate species recovery. The New England cottontail case study shows species status worsened despite avoiding listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
Area of Science:
- Conservation Biology
- Wildlife Management
- Endangered Species Policy
Background:
- Proactive Conservation encourages voluntary efforts to protect at-risk species before regulatory listing.
- The Policy for Evaluation of Conservation Efforts (PECE) is used with Proactive Conservation to avoid listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
- Critical evaluations of Proactive Conservation outcomes, particularly regarding species status and recovery metrics, are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the outcomes of Proactive Conservation using the New England cottontail as a case study.
- To assess the effectiveness of the PECE decision in preventing the listing of the New England cottontail under the ESA.
- To examine the broader benefits and limitations of the Proactive Conservation paradigm in relation to ESA implementation.
Main Methods:
- Review of the history and current status of the New England cottontail based on scientific literature.
- Analysis of the 2015 PECE decision and its impact on New England cottontail conservation.
- Evaluation of Proactive Conservation's benefits and limitations concerning species status and recovery metrics.
Main Results:
- The New England cottontail's status and recovery prospects under the PECE policy were overly optimistic; the species' condition has deteriorated since the listing decision.
- Proactive Conservation, coupled with PECE, may be used to avoid ESA listing due to perceptions of the ESA as punitive, despite low extinction rates for listed species.
- The current approach to recovery, linked to delisting, may be a barrier; decoupling recovery from delisting and focusing on persistence probability is suggested.
Conclusions:
- The Proactive Conservation paradigm, as applied with PECE for the New England cottontail, did not ensure sufficient species recovery.
- Revising recovery definitions to focus on probability of persistence could strengthen Species Status Assessments and improve endangered species management.
- Recommendations are made for refining the role of Proactive Conservation within the ESA framework for future at-risk species management.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Declining Populations
Conservation of Small Populations
What is Conservation Biology?
What is a Species?
Keystone Species
Speciation Rates

