Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.3K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.3K
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

12.6K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
12.6K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

13.1K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
13.1K
Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

6.8K
Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....
6.8K
Assembly of Signaling Complexes01:30

Assembly of Signaling Complexes

5.9K
Multiprotein signaling complexes are formed in a dynamic process involving protein-protein interactions at the cytoplasmic domain of transmembrane receptors or enzymatic and non-enzymatic proteins associated with the receptor. These complexes ensure the activation and propagation of intracellular signals that regulate cell functions.
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
5.9K
Assembly of Cytoskeletal Filaments01:18

Assembly of Cytoskeletal Filaments

21.3K
Cytoskeletal filaments are polymeric forms of smaller protein subunits. However, individual cytoskeletal filaments may easily disassemble or associate with other similar filaments to form rigid structures. Microfilaments, made of actin monomers, rely on actin-binding proteins to form bundles and create networks of individual actin filaments. Microtubules rely on microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) to form sturdy cylindrical structures. However, the proteins involved in forming complex...
21.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Paired Database of Predicted and Experimental Protein Peptide Binding Information.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

Functional Design and Biophysical Characterization of Analyte-Responsive Polymers.

Biomacromolecules·2025
Same author

Extracellular Peptide-Ligand Dimerization Actuator Receptor Design for Reversible and Spatially Dosed 3D Cell-Material Communication.

ACS synthetic biology·2024
Same author

Analysis of how antigen mutations disrupt antibody binding interactions toward enabling rapid and reliable antibody repurposing.

mAbs·2024
Same author

Using Short Molecular Dynamics Simulations to Determine the Important Features of Interactions in Antibody-Protein Complexes.

Proteins·2024
Same author

An Orthogonal Workflow of Electrochemical, Computational, and Thermodynamic Methods Reveals Limitations of Using a Literature-Reported Insulin Binding Peptide in Biosensors.

ACS omega·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

305

MutDock: A computational docking approach for fixed-backbone protein scaffold design.

Varun M Chauhan1, Robert J Pantazes1

  • 1Chemical Engineering Department, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.

Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
|September 15, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A novel computational method, MutDock, simultaneously docks and mutates fixed-backbone protein scaffolds for improved binding to target epitopes. This approach enhances the discovery of new therapeutic protein binders.

Keywords:
binding energyforce fieldhydrogen bondsprotein dockingprotein scaffold

More Related Videos

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

487
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

305
Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

487
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.1K

Area of Science:

  • Protein engineering and computational biology
  • Biomolecular design and drug discovery
  • Structural bioinformatics

Background:

  • Therapeutic antibodies face production and design challenges, leading to the development of smaller alternative binding scaffolds.
  • Alternative scaffolds recognize targets via surface mutations without altering backbone structure, but computational design lags behind antibodies.
  • Existing computational methods like dock-and-mutate have limitations due to fixed scaffold representations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel computational approach, MutDock, for simultaneous docking and mutation of fixed-backbone scaffolds.
  • To enhance the identification of superior binding poses by considering scaffold mutations during docking.
  • To improve the discovery of novel binders based on smaller protein scaffolds.

Main Methods:

  • MutDock employs a two-step process: pairwise distance alignment of hydrogen bonds and mutation of unfavorable residues.
  • The method considers native and mutated rotamers of scaffold residues and compatible epitope atoms.
  • MutDock was applied to Affibodies and DARPins, docking them with ten random antigens.

Main Results:

  • MutDock identified docked poses with higher or comparable binding energies compared to ZDOCK and HADDOCK.
  • The approach successfully docked smaller, fixed-backbone protein scaffolds with antigens.
  • Binding energies of MutDock poses were minimized and compared against established docking software.

Conclusions:

  • MutDock offers a novel computational strategy for designing protein binders with fixed-backbone scaffolds.
  • The method advances the computational design of alternative binding proteins beyond traditional antibody design.
  • This work facilitates the discovery of new therapeutic binders using smaller, engineered protein scaffolds.