Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

RNA-seq

RNA-seq

RNA sequencing, or RNA-Seq, is a high-throughput sequencing technology used to study the transcriptome of a cell. Transcriptomics helps to interpret the functional elements of a genome and identify the molecular constituents of an organism. Additionally, it also helps in understanding the development of an organism and the occurrence of diseases.
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Molecular Clocks in Translational Roadmap for Circadian-Based Therapeutics in Lung Diseases.

FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology·2026

Same author

scRNA sequencing revealed HIV-associated inflammation-mediated lung epithelial dysregulation and fibroblast remodeling.

Frontiers in immunology·2026

Same author

Understanding online sentiment toward waterpipe tobacco smoking by applying deep-learning language models to Twitter posts (2021-2023) in the United States.

Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco·2026

Same author

SenSet defines cell-type specific senescence signatures in the aged human lung.

The EMBO journal·2026

Same author

Toxicity, Chemistry, and Public Health Relevance of Emerging Nicotine Analog Vapes, Pods, and Pouches.

Chemical research in toxicology·2026

Same author

PPAR-gamma regulates PFAS-mediated proinflammatory cytokines in lung epithelial cells.

Frontiers in pharmacology·2026

Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026

Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026

Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026

Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026

Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026

Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

An evaluation of RNA-seq differential analysis methods.

Dongmei Li¹, Martin S Zand^1,2, Timothy D Dye³

¹Clinical and Translational Science Institute, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States of America.

|September 16, 2022

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Comparing eight RNA-seq differential analysis methods, EBSeq is recommended for small sample sizes (n=3) with negative binomial data, while DESeq2 is better for larger sample sizes (n≥6). For log-normal data, DESeq and DESeq2 are top choices.

More Related Videos

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data

Published on: June 24, 2021

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Published on: June 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data

Published on: June 24, 2021

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Published on: June 8, 2020

Area of Science:

Bioinformatics
Computational Biology
Genomics

Background:

RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) is crucial for gene expression analysis.
Identifying differentially expressed genes is a key challenge in RNA-seq studies.
Numerous statistical methods exist for RNA-seq differential expression analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate and compare the performance of eight popular RNA-seq differential analysis methods.
To assess method performance across various scenarios, including library sizes, distribution assumptions, and sample sizes.
To provide recommendations for RNA-seq data analysis based on empirical evidence.

Main Methods:

Conducted simulation studies using RNA-seq count data.
Compared eight methods: edgeR, DESeq, DESeq2, baySeq, EBSeq, NOISeq, SAMSeq, Voom.
Evaluated performance based on false discovery rate (FDR) control, power, and stability.
Analyzed real RNA-seq data for discovery counts and stability.

Main Results:

No significant differences in FDR control, power, or stability were observed with equal or unequal library sizes.
For negative binomial data, EBSeq excelled with small sample sizes (n=3); DESeq2 performed better with larger sizes (n=6 or 12).
For log-normal data, DESeq and DESeq2 demonstrated superior performance across all tested sample sizes.
Method performance generally improved with increased sample size, except for DESeq.

Conclusions:

EBSeq is recommended for RNA-seq studies with small sample sizes (n=3) and negative binomial distribution.
DESeq2 is recommended for sample sizes of 6 or more with negative binomial distribution.
DESeq and DESeq2 are recommended for RNA-seq data following a log-normal distribution.