Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Increased prevalence of synaesthesia in musicians.

Perception·2025
Same author

Synesthesia is linked to large and extensive differences in brain structure and function as determined by whole-brain biomarkers derived from the HCP (Human Connectome Project) cortical parcellation approach.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2024
Same author

Can the neural representation of physical pain predict empathy for pain in others?

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2024
Same author

Fibromyalgia is linked to increased subjective sensory sensitivity across multiple senses.

Perception·2024
Same author

When small effect sizes become huge: Synaesthesia is linked to very large differences in cognition.

Perception·2023
Same author

A symptom network model of misophonia: From heightened sensory sensitivity to clinical comorbidity.

Journal of clinical psychology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 28, 2025

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

7.8K

Irrelevant sights and sounds require spatial suppression: ERP evidence.

Jessica Lunn1, Nick Berggren2, Jamie Ward1

  • 1School of Psychology and Sussex Neuroscience, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

Psychophysiology
|September 17, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Irrelevant visual, auditory, and multisensory distractors can capture spatial attention. New research identifies an auditory analog of the P_D component (P_AD), showing multisensory distractors do not uniquely enhance attentional capture.

Keywords:
ERPsattentional capturedistractionpdsuppressionvisual search

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.1K
Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization
12:00

Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization

Published on: November 19, 2014

13.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 28, 2025

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

7.8K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.1K
Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization
12:00

Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization

Published on: November 19, 2014

13.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Irrelevant stimuli can disrupt primary tasks, but whether this involves spatial attention competition is debated.
  • Existing research often uses task-relevant distractors or is limited to the visual domain.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if task-irrelevant visual, auditory, and multisensory distractors compete for spatial attention.
  • To identify electrophysiological markers of attentional capture by different distractor types.
  • To test if multisensory distractors have a unique ability to capture attention.

Main Methods:

  • Behavioral and electroencephalography (ERP) measurements during a central visual search task.
  • Presentation of lateralized visual, auditory, or multisensory distractors.
  • Analysis of event-related potentials (ERPs) for components like P_D and P_AD.

Main Results:

  • Visual and multisensory distractors elicited the P_D component, indicating spatial suppression.
  • An auditory analog of P_D, termed P_AD, was identified for auditory and multisensory distractors.
  • No evidence supported enhanced attentional competition from multisensory distractors.

Conclusions:

  • Both unisensory and multisensory irrelevant distractors can elicit an 'attend-to-me' signal, a precursor to spatial attentional capture.
  • Multisensory distractors do not possess a unique saliency that enhances attentional capture compared to unisensory distractors.
  • The findings challenge theories predicting attention competition should not occur with irrelevant stimuli.