Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Analysis of the accuracy of computer-assisted DCIA flap mandibular reconstruction applying a novel approach based on
David Steybe1, Philipp Poxleitner1, Marc C Metzger1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Background:
This study evaluated the accuracy of computer-assisted surgery (CAS)-driven DCIA (deep circumflex iliac artery) flap mandibular reconstruction by traditional morphometric methods and geometric morphometric methods (GMM).
Methods:
Reconstruction accuracy was evaluated by measuring distances and angles between bilateral anatomical landmarks. Additionally, the average length of displacements vectors between landmarks was computed to evaluate factors assumed to influence reconstruction accuracy. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to unveil main modes of dislocation.
Results:
High reconstruction accuracy could be demonstrated for a sample consisting of 26 patients. The effect of the number of segments and length of defect on reconstruction accuracy were close to the commonly used significance threshold (p = 0.062/0.060). PCA demonstrated displacement to result mainly from sagittal and transversal shifts.
Conclusions:
CAS is a viable approach to achieve high accuracy in mandibular reconstruction and GMM can facilitate the evaluation of factors influencing reconstruction accuracy and unveil main modes of dislocation in this context.
