Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
High-intensity statin therapy reduces risk of amputation and reintervention among patients undergoing lower extremity
Jane J He1, Joshua J Horns2, Larry W Kraiss1
1Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Insights
High-intensity statin therapy after lower extremity bypass (LEB) for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) significantly reduces amputation and reintervention risks. These findings support optimizing statin use post-LEB for better limb salvage outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Pharmacotherapy
Background:
- Statins are standard care for lower extremity bypass (LEB) in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).
- The impact of high-intensity statin therapy on limb salvage post-LEB remains unclear.
- Optimizing statin therapy may improve outcomes for CLTI patients undergoing LEB.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between high-intensity statin therapy and outcomes after LEB for CLTI.
- To determine if high-intensity statins reduce the risk of amputation and reintervention.
- To assess the dose-dependent effect of statin intensity on limb salvage.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of the IBM MarketScan database (2008-2017) for adult LEB patients with CLTI.
- Patients stratified into high-intensity, low-intensity, and limited statin therapy groups based on pharmacy claims.
- Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models used to analyze reintervention and amputation rates.
Main Results:
- 25,907 patients identified; 6696 (26%) received high-intensity statins.
- High-intensity statin use was associated with significantly lower risk of reintervention (HR 0.48) and amputation (HR 0.27) post-LEB.
- A dose-dependent effect was observed, and high-intensity statins reduced subsequent amputation risk after reintervention (HR 0.21).
Conclusions:
- High-intensity statin therapy following LEB for CLTI is linked to substantially lower reintervention and amputation rates.
- These findings suggest that maximizing statin intensity post-revascularization is beneficial for CLTI patients.
- Up-titrating or maintaining patients on high-intensity statins should be considered whenever feasible.
Objective:
Statins are considered standard-of-care medical therapy for patients undergoing lower extremity bypass (LEB) procedures for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). It is unclear, however, whether up-titrating and maintaining patients on higher-intensity statin medications following LEB improves limb salvage outcomes. This study was designed to evaluate whether high-intensity statin therapy impacts the risk of amputation and reintervention following LEB for patients with CLTI.
Methods:
The IBM MarketScan database was used to identify adult patients (18-99 years old) who underwent a LEB for CLTI between 2008 and 2017. Patients lacking insurance covering drug reimbursement or those who already had undergone amputation before time of bypass were excluded. Using pharmacy claims and national drug codes to define statin intensity, patients were stratified into three groups: high-intensity, low-intensity, and limited statin therapy. The association between intensity of statin therapy and need for reintervention and/or major amputation after LEB was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models.
Results:
A total of 25,907 patients who underwent LEB for CLTI were identified, of which 6696 (26%) were maintained on high-dose statins, 9297 (36%) were on low-dose statins, and 9914 (38%) had inconsistent pharmacy claims for statin therapy after surgery. Patients on high-intensity statins were, on average, younger and more likely to be male with comorbid disease (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, renal insufficiency, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and tobacco abuse) than patients on low-intensity statins or limited statin therapy (P < .001 for all comparisons). Following LEB, 6649 patients (25.6%) required a reintervention, and 2550 patients (9.8%) went on to have a major amputation during follow-up. Patients maintained on high-intensity statins after LEB had a significantly lower likelihood of requiring a reintervention (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.51; P < .001) or amputation (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.24-0.30; P < .001) as compared with patients on limited statin therapy. Further, there was a dose-dependent effect for these outcomes relative to patients on low-intensity statins in risk-adjusted models, and it was independent of whether an autologous vein graft was used for the LEB. Finally, among patients who underwent a reintervention, high-dose statin therapy also significantly reduced the HR for subsequent amputation (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.18-0.25; P < .001).
Conclusions:
Patients with CLTI on high-intensity therapy following LEB had a significantly lower risk of requiring subsequent reintervention and amputation when compared with patients on low-intensity statins or with limited statin use. These data suggest that patients with CLTI should be up-titrated and/or maintained on high-intensity statins following revascularization whenever possible.
More Related Videos
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
04:30A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management