Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
Gaps after linear ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (Marshall-PLAN): Clinical implication
Takamitsu Takagi1, Nicolas Derval1, Josselin Duchateau1
1Hôpital Cardiologique Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, L'Institut de RYthmologie et modélisation Cardiaque (LIRYC), Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Gaps in atrial fibrillation ablation lines reduce success. Closing these gaps, particularly in the dome isthmus, significantly improves long-term sinus rhythm maintenance after procedures.
Area of Science:
- Electrophysiology
- Cardiac Ablation
- Atrial Fibrillation Management
Background:
- Anatomic isthmus transection is an adjunctive strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation, complementing pulmonary vein (PV) isolation.
- Data on the durability and impact of gaps within these complex lesion sets are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of gaps within the lesion set of pulmonary vein isolation and isthmus transection for persistent atrial fibrillation.
- To assess the durability of multiple lines of block and the effect of gap closure on outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A consecutive cohort of 291 patients underwent vein of Marshall ethanol infusion, PV isolation, and mitral, cavotricuspid, and dome isthmus transection.
- Dome isthmus transection utilized two strategies: a single roof line or an alternative floor line based on high-density mapping to identify and address gaps.
Main Results:
- Twelve-month sinus rhythm maintenance was 70% after one procedure and 94% after repeat procedures. Residual gaps significantly lowered event-free survival (P = .004).
- Delayed gaps were common in patients experiencing recurrence, with PV gaps increasing atrial fibrillation recurrence risk (67% vs 34%; P = .02) and isthmus gaps associated with atrial tachycardias (60%).
- The second strategy, involving a floor line if roof lines showed gaps, significantly reduced delayed dome gaps (43% vs 68%; P = .05).
Conclusions:
- Gaps within ablation lines are arrhythmogenic and negatively impact outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation treatment.
- Optimized ablation techniques and thorough assessment to minimize and close gaps are crucial for improving sinus rhythm maintenance and reducing recurrence.
Related Concept Videos
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias

