Related Experiment Video For Bladder cancer
Updated: Aug 28, 2025
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Radiomics Signature Using Manual Versus Automated Segmentation for Lymph Node Staging of Bladder Cancer
Eva Gresser1, Piotr Woźnicki2, Katharina Messmer3
1Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Background:
Bladder cancer (BC) treatment algorithms depend on accurate tumor staging. To date, computed tomography (CT) is recommended for assessment of lymph node (LN) metastatic spread in muscle-invasive and high-risk BC. However, the diagnostic efficacy of radiologist-evaluated CT imaging studies is limited.
Objective:
To evaluate the performance of quantitative radiomics signatures for detection of LN metastases in BC.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
Of 1354 patients with BC who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) with lymphadenectomy who were screened, 391 with pathological nodal staging (pN0: n = 297; pN+: n = 94) were included and randomized into training (n = 274) and test (n = 117) cohorts. Pelvic LNs were segmented manually and automatically. A total of 1004 radiomics features were extracted from each LN and a machine learning model was trained to assess pN status using histopathology labels as the ground truth.
Outcome Measurements And Statistical Analysis:
Radiologist assessment was compared to radiomics-based analysis using manual and automated LN segmentations for detection of LN metastases in BC. Statistical analysis was performed using the receiver operating characteristics curve method and evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC).
Results And Limitations:
In total, 1845 LNs were manually segmented. Automated segmentation correctly located 361/557 LNs in the test cohort. Manual and automatic masks achieved an AUC of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.91; p = 0.64) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.58-0.82; p = 0.17), respectively, in the test cohort compared to radiologist assessment, with an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI 0.67-0.89). A combined model of a manually segmented radiomics signature and radiologist assessment reached an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.71-0.92; p = 0.63).
Conclusions:
A radiomics signature allowed discrimination of nodal status with high diagnostic accuracy. The model based on manual LN segmentation outperformed the fully automated approach.
Patient Summary:
For patients with bladder cancer, evaluation of computed tomography (CT) scans before surgery using a computer-based method for image analysis, called radiomics, may help in standardizing and improving the accuracy of assessment of lymph nodes. This could be a valuable tool for optimizing treatment options.
