Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

2.2K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.2K
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

3.1K
When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.1K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

2.6K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
2.6K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.3K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.3K
Sample Size Calculation01:19

Sample Size Calculation

3.7K
Knowledge of the sample size is the first requirement to conduct random sampling or an experiment. The sample size is the total number of units, observations, or groups (in some cases) used to get the data to estimate a population parameter. As the name suggests, the sample size is that of the sample drawn from the population and differs from the population size.
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
3.7K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.4K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pseudo-slimy: A novel phenomenon to evoke stickiness perception.

i-Perception·2026
Same author

FingerWrap: A High-Density Finger-Enveloping Tactile Display.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
Same author

Presenting scenes upside down impairs visual detection of temporal reversal.

iScience·2026
Same author

Eliciting Pleasantness With Haptic Feedback: The Role of Physical and Pseudo-Haptic Resistance in Virtual Archery.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025
Same author

Perceiving direction of deformation-based motion.

i-Perception·2025
Same author

Visual Features Involved in Determining Apparent Elasticity Elicit Touch Desire.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025
Same journal

Correction: A method for supervoxel-wise association studies of age and other non-imaging variables from coronary computed tomography angiograms.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Poly(bromophenol blue)/CoSn(OH)<sub>6</sub> cubic particles modified pencil graphite electrode for electrochemical determination of diphenhydramine.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Dietary Chlorella, Spirulina, and acidifier modulate jejunal cytokine-related gene expression in broiler chickens.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Perceived physical activity barriers in university students: associations with fatigue and eating behaviours.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Refuge limitation structures habitat use in agricultural landscapes: evidence from Sunda pangolins.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Lightweight stateless transaction verification with outsourced witness updates for UTXO blockchains.

Scientific reports·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K

Underestimation in temporal numerosity judgments computationally explained by population coding model.

Takahiro Kawabe1, Yusuke Ujitoko2, Takumi Yokosaka2

  • 1NTT Communication Science Laboratories, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation, Atsugi, Japan. takkawabe@gmail.com.

Scientific Reports
|September 17, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans often underestimate sequential signal counts. Computational modeling suggests this numerosity underestimation arises from temporal integration of neural activity, though an aging effect requires further study.

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Accurate numerosity judgment is crucial for survival.
  • Sequential signal processing often leads to underestimation of quantity.
  • Understanding the neural mechanisms of numerosity perception is key.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the mechanism behind numerosity underestimation in sequential tasks.
  • To develop and test a computational model of sequential numerosity processing.

Main Methods:

  • Computational modeling based on population coding principles.
  • Simulating neural responses to sequential signals with a temporal integration window.
  • Decoding total signal count via weighted average of integrated neural activity.

Main Results:

  • The model accurately predicted general trends in human numerosity underestimation.
  • A novel aging effect, where the elderly show greater underestimation, was observed but not fully explained by the model.
  • The model supports temporal integration as a primary mechanism for sequential numerosity judgment.

Conclusions:

  • Humans likely judge sequential signal numbers by temporally integrating neural representations of numerosity.
  • The proposed model provides a framework for understanding numerosity perception.
  • Further research is needed to fully account for age-related differences in numerosity estimation.