Three-Dimensional Orientation of the Native Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The aim of this study was to describe the three-dimensional orientation of the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by calculating the angles of inclination in relation to the axial plane which is given for the knee joint line in a group of healthy individuals. These could help to establish guidelines that may be used for the surgical positioning of bone tunnels during ACL reconstruction. A total of 290 MRI scans of patients with integrity of the ACL were evaluated; three observers identified the coordinates of the femoral and tibial insertion sites, then it is defined the vector and evaluated its angles with respect to axial axis and calculated the angles with trigonometric equations. The data were analyzed according to the age, sex, side, BMI, and height of the patients, and the interobserver reliability was calculated. The patient demographics were as follows: age average: 45 years old, BMI average: 27.1, 54% right knees, and 60% female. The average angle for all the measurements was 76.95 degrees (SD ± 6.8 degrees) in the sagittal plane, 81.65 degrees (SD ± 7.79 degrees) in the coronal plane and 33.17 degrees (SD ± 4.98 degrees) in the axial plane. No statistically significant differences were found between the categorical variables mentioned; moderate to substantial interobserver reliability strength was found with an average kappa of 0.791 for all measurements. The three-dimensional orientation of the native ACL in a group of healthy individuals was established. The findings can be helpful for performing anatomical reconstructions of the ACL in injured patients using as reference the average calculated angles, or measure of the contralateral non-injured knee for surgical planning; these results serve as a basis for the design of a technique that optimizes the three-dimensional position of the ACL when it undergoes reconstruction in the trend toward greater precision for better functional results. Biomechanical and clinical-surgical studies are required to further evaluate our results.