Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Author Spotlight: Utilizing Venoplasty Balloon Model in Rodents to Simulate Surgical Interventions for Deep Veins
Published on: May 24, 2024
Meta-Analysis Comparing Drug-Coated Balloons and Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for Infrapopliteal Artery
Mahmoud Barbarawi1, Abdul Haseeb Qazi2, Juyong Lee1
1Division of Cardiology, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut.
Insights
Drug-coated balloons (DCB) significantly reduce restenosis and revascularization in critical limb ischemia patients with infrapopliteal arterial disease compared to conventional balloon angioplasty (PTA). DCB treatment showed no increased risk of mortality or amputation.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Critical limb ischemia (CLI) due to infrapopliteal peripheral arterial disease (PAD) poses significant treatment challenges.
- Conventional percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) has limitations in managing complex infrapopliteal lesions.
- Limited comparative data exists on drug-coated balloons (DCB) versus PTA for infrapopliteal PAD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct an updated meta-analysis assessing the safety and efficacy of DCB compared to conventional PTA.
- To evaluate DCB's effectiveness in treating infrapopliteal arterial disease in patients with CLI.
- To synthesize current evidence on key clinical outcomes including restenosis, revascularization, mortality, and amputation.
Main Methods:
- Systematic database search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library up to November 15, 2021.
- Inclusion of randomized controlled trials comparing DCB with conventional PTA for infrapopliteal arterial disease.
- Meta-analysis of 9 trials involving 1,501 participants, reporting risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Main Results:
- DCB demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of restenosis (RR 0.48, p=0.0001) compared to PTA.
- DCB usage was associated with a significant reduction in clinically driven target lesion revascularization (RR 0.54, p=0.006).
- No significant differences were observed in all-cause mortality, major target limb amputation, or major adverse cardiovascular events between DCB and PTA.
Conclusions:
- DCB is a safe and effective treatment option for infrapopliteal arterial disease in patients with CLI.
- DCB significantly reduces restenosis and the need for revascularization compared to conventional PTA.
- DCB does not increase the risk of mortality or major limb amputation, offering a favorable safety profile.
Abstract:
Limited data is available regarding the safety and effectiveness of drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus conventional percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of critical limb ischemia because of infrapopliteal peripheral arterial disease. We conducted an updated meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of DCB in the treatment of infrapopliteal disease. A database search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed by 2 reviewers from inception through November 15, 2021. Randomized trials that compared DCB with conventional PTA in treating infrapopliteal arterial disease were included. The risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. A total of 9 trials were included (1,501 participants) in the study. The mean age was 71.1 ± 10.2 years. Regarding the primary end points, treating infrapopliteal arterial disease with DCB had a lower incidence of re-stenosis (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.70, p = 0.0001) with no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.69, p = 0.61), compared with conventional PTA. With regards to the secondary end points, DCB usage was associated with a significant reduction in clinically driven target lesion revascularization (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.84, p = 0.006) with no significant difference with regards to major target limb amputation and major adverse cardiovascular events (p ≥0.05). In conclusion, among patients with critical limb ischemia secondary to infrapopliteal artery disease, DCB usage was associated with a significantly lower number of restenosis and clinically driven target lesion revascularization compared with conventional PTA. There was no increase in all-cause mortality or major target limb amputation with the use of DCB.
More Related Videos
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation