Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

556
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
556
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

175
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
175
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

259
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
259
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

281
Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
281
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

282
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
282
The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test01:19

The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test

498
The Mantel-Cox log-rank test is a widely used statistical method for comparing the survival distributions of two groups. It tests whether a statistically significant difference exists in survival times between the groups without assuming a specific distribution for the survival data, making it a non-parametric test. This flexibility makes the log-rank test particularly valuable in medical research and other fields where the timing of an event, such as death or disease recurrence, is of...
498

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predicting Win-Loss Probabilities for Composite Time-to-Event Outcomes Under The Proportional Win-Fractions Regression Model.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Real-world outcomes for lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

Blood·2026
Same author

Optimizing Haploidentical Donor Selection for Pediatric Hematopoietic Cell Transplant.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same author

Rforce: Random Forests for Composite Endpoints.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Highly Reproducible, Vendor-Agnostic, Motion-Insensitive Liver PDFF Mapping at 0.55T, 1.5T, and 3T.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2025
Same author

Combined innate immune cell therapy, tumor-specific antibody, and radiation prompt antitumor response in pancreatic cancer models.

Science advances·2025
Same journal

Checking Genetic Homogeneity Between Two Samples Using Summary Statistics With Application to Mendelian Randomization.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian Learning Model for Joint Risk Prediction of Alcohol and Cannabis Use Disorders.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Reluctant Transfer Learning in Penalized Regressions for Individualized Treatment Rules Under Effect Heterogeneity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Predictor-Assisted Nonparametric Graphical Models With Multivariate Error-Prone Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Treatment Decision Estimation for Right-Censored Survival Data Through Parameter Transfer Learning.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Latent Class Log-Linear Models for Estimating Diagnostic Test Accuracy Without a Gold Standard: A Simulation Study.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K

Marginal semiparametric transformation models for clustered multivariate competing risks data.

Yizeng He1, Soyoung Kim1, Lu Mao2

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

Statistics in Medicine
|September 18, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new statistical model for analyzing complex survival data with multiple competing risks and clustered effects. The model improves inference accuracy for patient outcomes without needing to model censoring distributions.

Keywords:
competing risks datamultivariate outcomesemiparametric transformation model

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

349

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

349

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Multivariate survival models are crucial for analyzing multiple outcomes with right-censored data.
  • Competing risks, where one event precludes another (e.g., death vs. infection), complicate standard models and can lead to invalid inferences.
  • Clustered effects, common in matched or multi-center studies, further challenge competing risks analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a robust statistical framework for analyzing multivariate competing risks data with clustered effects.
  • To address limitations of existing models, particularly the need to specify censoring distributions and assumptions of proportional subdistribution hazards.
  • To enable accurate joint inference for all causes and outcomes in complex clinical scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Propose a marginal semiparametric transformation model for multivariate competing risks.
  • The model accommodates nonproportional subdistribution hazards structures.
  • The approach avoids the necessity of modeling the censoring distribution, a common limitation in prior methods.

Main Results:

  • The proposed model offers a flexible platform for joint inference across multiple causes and outcomes.
  • It provides valid statistical inferences even with nonproportional hazards and clustered data structures.
  • Demonstrates improved analytical capabilities compared to existing univariate models.

Conclusions:

  • The marginal semiparametric transformation model is a powerful tool for analyzing complex multivariate competing risks data.
  • This methodology enhances the accuracy of statistical inferences in clinical research involving clustered and competing risks outcomes.
  • Facilitates a more comprehensive understanding of disease progression and treatment effects in complex patient populations.