Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding
Published on: March 28, 2025
New Models for Predicting Pore Pressure and Fracture Pressure while Drilling in Mixed Lithologies Using Artificial
Samir Khaled1,2, Ahmed Ashraf Soliman1, Abdulrahman Mohamed1
1Petroleum Engineering and Gas Technology Department, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, British University in Egypt (BUE), El Sherouk City11837, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract:
Precise prediction of pore pressure and fracture pressure is a crucial aspect of petroleum engineering. The awareness of both fracture pressure and pore pressure is essential to control the well. It helps in the elimination of the problems related to drilling, waterflooding project, and hydraulic fracturing job such as fluid loss, kick, differential sticking, and blowout. Avoiding these problems enhances the performance and reduces the cost of operation. Several researchers proposed many models for predicting pore and fracture pressures using well log information, rock strength properties, or drilling data. However, some of these models are limited to one type of lithology such as clean and compacted shale formation, applicable only for the pressure generated by under compaction, and some of them cannot be used in unloading formations. Recently, artificial intelligence techniques showed a great performance in petroleum engineering applications. Hence, in this paper, two artificial neural network models are developed to estimate both pore pressure and fracture pressure through the use of 2820 data sets obtained from drilling data in mixed lithologies of sandstone, carbonate, and shale. The proposed artificial neural network (ANN) models achieved accurate estimation of pore and fracture pressures, where the coefficients of determination (R 2) for pore and fracture pressures are 0.974 and 0.998, respectively. Another data set from the Middle East was used to validate the developed models. The models estimated the pore and fracture pressures with high R 2 values of 0.90 and 0.99, respectively. This work demonstrates the validity and reliability of the developed models to calculate pore and fracture pressures from real-time surface drilling parameters by considering the formation type to overcome the limitation of previous models.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Microcracking in Concrete
Porosity and Absorption of Aggregate
When all pores in an aggregate are filled with water, the aggregate is considered saturated and surface-dry. If left in dry air, water will evaporate until the...
Porosity in Cement Paste
The balance of water to cement in the mix is...
Permeability of Concrete
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by...
Plane Potential Flows
Uniform...

