Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2015
Clinical, Experimental, and Computational Validation of a New Doppler-Based Index for Coarctation Severity Assessment
Arash Ghorbannia1, Chalani D Ellepola2, Ronald K Woods3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin, and Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Insights
A new Doppler-based diastolic index, continuous flow pressure gradient (CFPG), shows superior accuracy in assessing aortic coarctation severity compared to conventional methods. This advancement may improve patient outcomes by refining intervention guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Hemodynamics
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Long-term morbidity, including hypertension, persists in patients with coarctation of the aorta despite current guidelines.
- Invasive assessment of coarctation severity relies on peak-to-peak catheter pressure gradient (PPCG).
- Noninvasive estimation using peak instantaneous Doppler gradient (PIDG) has limitations due to equation simplifications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a novel Doppler-based diastolic index, continuous flow pressure gradient (CFPG).
- To compare CFPG with conventional indices (PIDG) in assessing coarctation severity.
- To determine CFPG's correlation with invasively measured pressure gradients.
Main Methods:
- Quantified PIDG and CFPG using color flow echocardiography in rabbits and humans with coarctation.
- Compared CFPG and PIDG with invasive PPCG in rabbits and arm-leg systolic gradients in humans.
- Utilized analysis of variance, Pearson's correlation, linear regression, and Bland-Altman analysis for comparison.
Main Results:
- CFPG demonstrated superior correlation with invasive gradients (R² > 0.80) compared to PIDG (R² < 0.63).
- CFPG thresholds identified significant coarctation severity in both rabbits and humans.
- Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed mild improvement with CFPG (AUC 0.94-0.95) versus PIDG (AUC 0.89-0.95).
- Inter-/intraobserver variability was low, indicating reliable measurements.
Conclusions:
- CFPG shows significant potential for accurate echocardiography-based assessment of coarctation severity.
- CFPG may aid in translating preclinical findings to refine clinical guidelines for aortic coarctation.
- Improved assessment accuracy with CFPG could help limit long-term morbidity in coarctation patients.
Background:
Long-term morbidity including hypertension often persists in coarctation patients despite current guidelines. Coarctation severity can be invasively assessed via peak-to-peak catheter pressure gradient (PPCG), which is estimated noninvasively via simplified Bernoulli equation and conventionally reported as peak instantaneous Doppler gradient (PIDG). However, underlying simplifications of the equation limit diagnostic accuracy. We studied the diagnostic performance of a new Doppler-based diastolic index called the continuous flow pressure gradient (CFPG) versus conventional indices in assessing coarctation severity.
Methods:
In a rabbit model mimicking human aortic coarctation, temporal blood pressure waveforms revealed the diastolic instantaneous pressure gradients and spectral Doppler features impacted by coarctation severity. We therefore hypothesized that CFPG provides superior correlation with coarctation gradients measured invasively. PIDG and CFPG were quantified using color flow echocardiography in humans and rabbits with discrete coarctations. Results were compared with PPCG in rabbits (n = 34) and arm-leg systolic gradients (n = 25) in humans via 1-way analysis of variance, Pearson's correlation, linear regression, and Bland-Altman analysis.
Results:
A threshold of CFPG ≥ 4.6 mm Hg was identified via the Youden index as representative of PPCG ≥ 20 mm Hg (the current guideline value for coarctation intervention) in rabbits, while a CFPG ≥1.0 mm Hg represented an arm-leg systolic gradient ≥20 mm Hg in humans. Accuracy measures revealed superior correlation of CFPG (R2 > 0.80) and mild receiver operating characteristic improvement (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.94-0.95) compared with PIDG (R2 < 0.63; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.89-0.95). Inter-/intraobserver variability tested by intraclass correlation coefficient revealed measurement reliability with differences ≤8.2% and 10.7%, respectively. Computational simulations of anesthetized versus conscious hemodynamics showed parameters were minimally impacted by isoflurane inherent in the data used to derive CFPG. These results confirm the potential diagnostic accuracy of CFPG in echocardiography-based coarctation severity assessment. We are optimistic that CFPG will be useful for translation of results from preclinical studies that revisit current guidelines to limit morbidity in humans with aortic coarctation.
Related Concept Videos
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation

