Preliminary evidence that misalignment between sleep and circadian timing alters risk-taking preferences

Decision-making has been shown to suffer when circadian preference is misaligned with time of assessment; however, little is known about how misalignment between sleep timing and the central circadian clock impacts decision-making. This study captured naturally occurring variation in circadian alignment (i.e., alignment of sleep-wake timing with the central circadian clock) to examine if greater misalignment predicts worse decision-making. Over the course of 2 weeks, 32 late adolescent drinkers (aged 18-22 years; 61% female; 69% White) continuously wore actigraphs and completed two overnight in-laboratory visits (Thursday and Sunday) in which both dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO) and behavioural decision-making (risk taking, framing, and strategic reasoning tasks) were assessed. Sleep-wake timing was assessed by actigraphic midsleep from the 2 nights prior to each in-laboratory visit. Alignment was operationalised as the phase angle (interval) between average DLMO and average midsleep. Multilevel modelling was used to predict performance on decision-making tasks from circadian alignment during each in-laboratory visit; non-linear associations were also examined. Shorter DLMO-midsleep phase angle predicted greater risk-taking under conditions of potential loss (B = -0.11, p = 0.06), but less risk-taking under conditions of potential reward (B = 0.14, p = 0.03) in a curvilinear fashion. Misalignment did not predict outcomes in the framing and strategic reasoning tasks. Findings suggest that shorter alignment in timing of sleep with the central circadian clock (e.g., phase-delayed misalignment) may impact risky decision-making, further extending accumulating evidence that sleep/circadian factors are tied to risk-taking. Future studies will need to replicate findings and experimentally probe whether manipulating alignment influences decision-making.